Press "Enter" to skip to content

PARTICLES OF DESTRUCTION

by Celeste Solum

 

The UN, WHO, and WEF are preparing the world, as if they were tilling the ground, for the New World Health Order coming to you this May. Do not misunderstand, this has been in the works for a very long time, officially since 2005.  This past week saw sweeping changes.

Biden Administration Announces Global Health Security Partnership with 50 Countries as Pandemic Accord Flails

Biden Administration Announces Global Health Security Partnership with 50 Countries as Pandemic Accord Flails-AP

Biden is leveraging himself as the “Savior” for the next pandemic and this New World Health Order.

New Global Health Security Strategy  (64 pages)

This new strategy was truly codified on October 15, 2016 by Health and Human Services.  It was 88-pages and contained definitions and protocol for coming pandemics.  It is an official regulation and is the law of the land.  For case studies in that 2016 Proposed Regulations they used Coronvirus and Ebola.

The ASAP Framework: A New Tool for Regulatory Agencies to Facilitate Adoption of Pandemic Approaches

Executive Orders on COVID-19 Pandemic Rescinded

All of President Trump’s EO’s for COVID have been rescinded.  Biden will now pen new EO’s lock-step with the UN and WHO.

GLOBAL HEALTH GROUPS PROPOSE NEW TERMINOLOGY FOR PATHOGENS THAT SPREAD THROUGH THE AIR

There is new terminology for the coming pandemics.  The nutshell version is extremely illuminating:

All particles will be considered INFECTIVE.  Consider the ramifications of this statement.  Yikes, think of those dust bunnies under your bed!

No longer will we consider the SIZE of the particle.  It will be forbidden to discuss whether it is atomic, dust, bacteria, “virus”, fungal, drop, or wad of mucous.

No longer will we be able in free-society to discuss the ORIGIN of the particle.  Is it human, animal, plant, bacterial, “viral”, fungal, synthetic biology, technological, geoengineered, extinct animated life, or even alien.

Let us deep dive:

Global Health Groups Propose New Terminology for Pathogens That Spread Through the Air

Well into the COVID-19 pandemic, the WHO and the CDC were reluctant to use terms like “airborne,” “airborne transmission,” and “aerosol transmission” to describe the spread of the virus through the air, while other experts used various definitions to describe the phenomenon, sowing confusion about how the disease was circulating.

A new report proposes NEW UMBRELLA TERMINOLOGY for pathogens that transmit “through the air,” which include not only SARS-CoV-2, but also influenza, measles, MERS-CoV, SARS, and tuberculosis. Source:  CIDRAP, WHO.

Umbrella terminology refers to a word or phrase that encompasses a wide range of concepts, ideas, or subjects within a common category. It is a term used to describe a broad and general concept that covers various specific items or entities. Umbrella terms are often used in various fields, such as science, medicine, business, or marketing, to simplify complex ideas and provide a common language for communication.

You must understand that this new terminology is a Living Document.  It can change in as little as ever 48-hours.  This semantic shell game has been going on for decades.

THROUGH THE AIR & THE PANDEMIC X

What do think of when you hear the words, “through the air”?  I think of electromagnetic radiation (EMF), like WiFi.  The next pandemic will be, according to government and military sources, a hemorrhagic event.

  • It will be TRIGGERED by frequency.
  • It will send a malicious computer-like code into your body-developed in the 1990’s and early 2000’s.
  • It will tell your body to bleed out.
  • At the same time, the internet as you know it will collapse or melt-down.  This pandemic you will have NO CONNECTIONS.
  • It is referred to as Ebola of Systems or Ebola of Networks.
  • After many people die, a new “Internet” will emerge. To participate, you must comply 100% to agenda demands.  That is if you live at all.

IT’S A BIRD, IT’S A PLANE, IT’S AIRBORNE

During the last pandemic, the terms ‘airborne’, ‘airborne transmission’, ‘droplets’ and ‘aerosols’ were used in different ways, by different stakeholders, which contributed to confusion in communicating how this pathogen was transmitted to populations via air. A lack of consensus on what exactly is meant by ‘airborne’, ‘airborne transmission’ necessitated better alignment of these terms across disciplines, agencies and pathogens.

From an Emergency Management perspective this does make sense because during one activation two Emergency Operation Centers had the same name caused confusion and cost time to rectify, resulting in loss of life and property.  There does need to be a set definition of terms but NOT consensus, but we will get into that later.

In 2021, the WHO convened to determine the term ‘airborne transmission’, which included differences in particle sizes, duration in the air, distance travelled, method of dispersal and other properties.

The key objectives of this global technical consultation process were:

To bring together APPROVED and TRUSTED GLOBAL EXPERTS of various disciplines including experts in epidemiology, microbiology, clinical management, infection prevention and control, bioengineering, physics, air pollution, aerosol science, aerobiology, public health and social measures, and social science…

READ FULL ARTICLE HERE… (shepherdsheart.life)

Live Stream + Chat (zutalk.com)

 


Home | Caravan to Midnight (zutalk.com)

We Need Your Help To Keep Caravan To Midnight Going,

Please Consider Donating To Help Keep Independent Media Independent

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Breaking News: