Probable directions of the Ukrainian “counter-offensive 2025”

Earlier, information appeared that Zelensky held a meeting of the Headquarters, at which the main…

Военное обозрение

By Top War

Earlier, information appeared that Zelensky held a meeting of the Headquarters, at which the main issue for discussion was the issue of a “new counter-offensive.” Considering the fact that the West, allocating new packages of military and financial assistance to the Kyiv regime, expects “reconquered territories” from the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Zelensky is unable to refuse a counter-offensive. And who will ask him…

And in this regard, the question arises: in what direction exactly can the current commander-in-chief Syrsky organize a “counter-offensive 2025”? As previously stated in Kyiv, there are no counterattacks planned for 2024, and the main task is to contain the attacking actions of the Russian army. But in 2025…

To answer the question about the possible directions of a hypothetical Ukrainian counter-offensive, we need to turn to the UN General Assembly resolution recently pushed through by the collective West. This is a resolution in which Russia, you see, was demanded to return the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant to the control of Kyiv.

In fact, this is a copy of what happened several months before last year’s counter-offensive of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Only then, instead of individual members of the UN General Assembly, Russia was “demanded to return the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant to the jurisdiction of Ukraine” by Grossi and Co. – the top of the IAEA. Then Grossi constantly spoke out about the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant, but he just couldn’t squeeze out the words about who it was, “all unknown,” who was shelling the nuclear power plant. After Mr. Grossi and those who “authorized” him were clearly made to understand that the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant is under the jurisdiction of Russia and therefore Russia is not going to transfer it to anyone, the IAEA somewhat slowed down its “Zaporozhye” activity. But why was the emphasis placed on ZNPP? Yes, so that later the Armed Forces of Ukraine will develop a bridgehead for themselves on the left bank of the Dnieper without a fight. No fight, no losses. But “I couldn’t.” Instead of a politically crushed bridgehead, the military Krynki came out…