VT Foreign Policy It was Wednesday, the eve of the 9/11 anniversary. I was brushing up on my Spanish by watching a few minutes of TV news in a hotel lobby in Malaga when the story broke: Charlie Kirk had been shot. Though I have never been especially interested in Charlie Kirk—he always struck me as one of countless TV talking heads who somehow draw big audiences for unknown and perhaps unknowable reasons—I immediately sensed that his death might be more important than his life.
The mass-mediated demise of Charlie Kirk had all the earmarks of spectacular, politicized ritual sacrifice. Experts in the construction and maintenance of public myths, which is how Jewish-Zionist 9/11 czar Philip Zelikow memorably described himself, know that literary anthropologist René Girard was onto something: Most human beings are motivated by myths (sacred stories) not by facts, and one of the most powerful catalysts for mythmaking and myth-maintaining is ritual sacrifice. That’s why Zelikow & Co. scripted 9/11 as a spectacular ritual sacrifice of thousands of Americans designed to consecrate, in blood, a sacred bond between Americans and Israelis, and trigger the murder of millions whom Zionist Jews view as their enemies.
Charlie Kirk grew up in the shadow of that myth, the myth of 9/11, and lent his telegenic looks, voluble tongue, and modest intelligence to the cause of maintaining it. He was shot and killed on the eve of the 24th anniversary of 9/11, symbolically mixing his blood with the blood of the thousands of victims of the Israeli attacks on New York and Washington.
It’s suggestively mythic, though perhaps coincidental, that Kirk was felled by a shot to the throat. JFK, too, was initially struck in the throat, shortly before his brains were blown out the back of his head. Ritual sacrifice victims are commonly killed by throat-cuts, which sometimes extend into complete beheadings. Symbolically, cutting the victim’s throat can send a message about silencing the victim—as, for example, when freemasons ritually slash the throat of a moser who has spilled unspeakable secrets:
The Freemasonry oath for an Entered Apprentice includes a symbolic penalty where the candidate promises “to have my throat cut across, my tongue torn out by the roots” if they reveal Masonic secrets. -Google
Might Charlie Kirk have spilled a secret or two? Ricky Hale points out: “While Kirk had supported Israel’s genocide, he had started examining October 7 and called it an inside job.” Kirk was also starting to let his conservative Christian followers in on another big, nasty secret: Zionist Jews dominate the media and are by far the biggest force behind all forms of censorship in the West.
(Kirk) had complained about how Israel is the one country he is not allowed to criticize and Zionists were turning against him. He opposed Trump’s crack down on anti-Israel protests at universities…
Kirk had also begun unveiling another awful secret: that Jewish money is behind “cultural Marxism.”
Charlie Kirk: Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. Now I don’t like generalizations. Not every Jewish person believes that. But it is true. The Anti-Defamation League was part and parcel with Black Lives Matter.
It is true that some of the largest financiers of left wing anti-white causes have been Jewish Americans. They went all in on woke. And it wasn’t just ADL, it was some of the top Jewish organizations in the country that have done that. In fact, we have seen this with the recent retreat of Jewish donations that are no longer going to be administered to colleges.
Mark Rowan, Leon Kopperman, can we get that full list? It’s very powerful…
READ FULL ARTICLE HERE…- VT Foreign Policy
Home | Caravan to Midnight (zutalk.com)
Be First to Comment