A Tale of Two Wars – Future Proves Past

Author: Brendi Wells

Introduction: The Repeating Cycles of History

In the study of history, it is often said that “those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This paper examines the striking parallels between the events leading up to World War II and the current trajectory towards what many fear could become World War III. By drawing direct comparisons between Adolf Hitler’s rise and Donald Trump’s presidency, this analysis explores the concept of “future proves past,” where historical patterns, actors, and strategies appear to be resurfacing in our modern context.
The manipulation of global powers, the role of financial elites, economic warfare, and the influence of the media have been crucial factors in shaping conflicts throughout history. As we look back at the events of the 20th century, particularly the involvement of Zionist interests and their complex relationship with Nazi Germany, we find similar dynamics unfolding today with Western globalist elites and their entanglement with Trump’s administration. The aim of this paper is to uncover these recurring strategies and to evaluate whether we are witnessing a rerun of past events, or if modern-day leaders, aware of the historical playbook, might alter the course of history this time around.

Before diving into this analysis, I encourage you to set aside any preconceived notions about Adolf Hitler and the established narratives taught in mainstream history. Much of what we believe about these events is shaped by victors’ narratives, influenced by propaganda, and selective storytelling. This paper aims to present a different perspective, challenging the traditional understanding of who Hitler was and exploring the deeper, hidden agendas at play. Suspend your learned history for the moment, and allow the evidence presented to guide you through a pattern that has repeated itself across generations. Only by keeping an open mind can the true nature of these events—and their modern-day equivalents—be fully understood.
By analyzing the infiltration, manipulation, and eventual betrayal faced by Germany under Hitler and comparing it to Trump’s current situation, this paper explores whether the same forces are at work once again. Is Trump destined to face the same fate as Hitler, betrayed by those who once supported him, or could his awareness of the past provide an opportunity to break the cycle and change the outcome? As the saying goes, history may not repeat itself, but it often rhymes. This analysis seeks to determine if we are living through another chapter of the same story, or if a new ending might be written.

WWII Context:
The true origins of the two World Wars are hidden behind layers of revisionist history, often blaming Germany as the primary aggressor. However, the reality points to the orchestration by a group of European Zionist Jews who aimed for the total destruction of Germany. Their intent was to gain control of Palestine by manipulating global powers into conflict, leading directly to the devastation of Europe.
WWIII Context:
Similarly, the origins of the impending World War III can be traced not to the nations blamed by mainstream media, but to a coalition of Western globalist elites, including Big Tech, the World Economic Forum, and influential billionaires. These modern-day architects appear intent on destabilizing nationalist leaders like Trump, aiming to consolidate control over global power structures, much as the Zionists did in their pursuit of Palestine.

The Betrayal of Allies

WWII Context:
In the lead-up to World War I, Germany offered England a negotiated peace deal. However, Zionist leaders intervened, persuading the British War Cabinet to reject Germany’s offer in exchange for U.S. military support, promising Palestine as a reward after the war. This betrayal set the stage for the long-standing animosity between Germany and the Jewish community, culminating in the harsh terms of the Treaty of Versailles.
WWIII Context:
Today, Trump’s attempts at de-escalating conflicts with Russia and China face similar sabotage from the deep state. The global elites, much like the Zionists of the past, manipulate foreign policy, pushing the U.S. toward confrontation. Deals are made behind closed doors with promises of political power and economic incentives, echoing the clandestine agreement that once exchanged Palestine for military support.

The Media’s Role: Then and Now

WWII Context:
Lord Beaverbrook, a prominent UK newspaper magnate, expressed concern about the strong Jewish influence driving Britain toward war with Germany. The Jewish control of media outlets played a critical role in shaping public opinion and pushing the narrative that led to the outbreak of World War II.
WWIII Context:
In 2023, leaked conversations reveal Rupert Murdoch’s similar concerns about the influence of Big Tech and globalist interests in shaping the media narrative against Trump. Today’s media, controlled by Silicon Valley executives and billionaire elites, pushes for conflict with Russia and China, much like the press campaigns that fueled the fires of World War II.

Economic Warfare: A Strategy Repeated

WWII Context:
The global Jewish community declared an economic war on Germany, organizing a worldwide boycott of German goods starting in 1933. This coordinated economic sabotage aimed to cripple Germany’s economy, severely reducing its ability to recover from the devastation of the First World War. The boycott had a devastating impact, particularly on Germany’s export-driven economy, which relied heavily on international trade. As a result, Germany experienced widespread poverty and food shortages, with estimates suggesting that the population faced severe malnutrition and up to one-third starved to death due to the collapsing economy. This economic stranglehold intensified public resentment and further inflamed tensions between the German populace and the Jewish community, setting the stage for the escalating conflict that led to World War II.
WWIII Context:
In the modern era, economic sanctions against Russia, China, and Trump’s America serve a similar purpose. The coordinated actions of the EU, Big Tech, and financial institutions mirror the economic boycotts of the past. These measures disrupt global trade, damage domestic industries, and push the world closer to the brink of conflict, just as they did in the 1930s.

The New Ultimatum: Then and Now

WWII Context:
In 1933, Jewish leaders issued an ultimatum to Germany: remove Hitler from power and restore Jewish positions in the government, or face a worldwide economic boycott. Germany’s refusal led to increased hostility and escalated the conflict, laying the groundwork for the Second World War.
WWIII Context:
Today, a similar ultimatum comes from the global elites: Trump must be politically neutralized, or they will continue their campaign to delegitimize his presidency through media attacks, legal challenges, and social unrest. Trump’s defiance mirrors Germany’s response, escalating the conflict and pushing the world closer to a modern-day global war.

Rewriting History: The Control of Narrative

WWII Context:
The Jewish boycott of Germany is often framed by historians as a justified response to Nazi anti-Semitism. However, the economic warfare began well before the Nazis took any action against the Jewish community, suggesting a deeper, premeditated strategy aimed at weakening Germany.
WWIII Context:
In today’s context, media outlets and platforms like Wikipedia frame the campaign against Trump as necessary resistance against “fascism.” This narrative control echoes the rewriting of history seen in the 20th century, obscuring the true motivations behind the actions of the global elites and shaping public perception to serve their interests.

Manufacturing Consent for War: The Lusitania and Nord Stream

WWII Context:
The sinking of the Lusitania, a passenger liner carrying munitions, was used as a pretext for the U.S. entry into World War I. Despite warnings from the German government, the incident was framed as an unprovoked attack, fueling anti-German sentiment and paving the way for America’s involvement in the conflict.
WWIII Context:
The sabotage of the Nord Stream pipeline serves a similar function in today’s geopolitical landscape. Framed as an act of Russian aggression, the incident is exploited by Western media to justify increased military involvement. The parallels to the Lusitania are clear: a manufactured event used to rally public support for war under false pretenses.

The Predicted Outcome: A Cycle Repeated

WWII Context:
Germany’s fate was sealed by the combined efforts of internal betrayal and external pressure. The narrative was rewritten by the victors, framing Hitler as the ultimate villain while obscuring the role of Zionist manipulation and economic sabotage. Germany was left in ruins, its legacy forever tarnished by the victors’ version of history.
WWIII Context:
America’s fate may mirror that of Germany if the current trajectory continues. The global elites aim to paint Trump as the ultimate dictator, rewriting history to label him a modern-day “Nazi” whose actions supposedly led to the downfall of democracy. Financial collapse, social chaos, and a devastating conflict could follow, with the globalists emerging victorious, their power consolidated, and the true architects of this downfall hidden behind a carefully constructed narrative.

The Infiltration and the Setup: Then and Now

WWII Context:
During the early years of Hitler’s rise to power, many Zionist Jews played a surprising role in supporting his ascent, providing financial backing and political leverage that helped him secure his position as Chancellor of Germany. The Haavara Agreement of 1933 is a prime example, where Zionists collaborated with the Nazi regime, facilitating the transfer of Jewish assets from Germany to Palestine. Jewish elites occupied key positions within the German government and financial sectors, using their influence to align with Hitler’s early policies. However, this support was part of a calculated strategy; once the Zionists achieved their goals of securing land in Palestine and consolidating power, they turned against Hitler. The Jewish elite betrayed him, organizing a global boycott and leveraging their control of the media to paint him as the ultimate villain, setting the stage for World War II.
WWIII Context:
In a strikingly similar fashion, Jewish financial elites and influential Zionist figures initially backed Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, providing crucial funding and media support that helped propel him to the White House. Trump’s strong pro-Israel stance, his recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, and his appointments of Jewish advisors and cabinet members reflect a deep entanglement with powerful Jewish interests. Figures like Jared Kushner, Steve Mnuchin, and Gary Cohn, all of whom hold strong ties to the Jewish community and global financial networks, were placed in key roles within Trump’s administration. This infiltration mirrors the strategy used against Hitler: align with the leader to gain influence, then pivot when the time is right.

The Big Betrayal: A Repeated Strategy?

Just as the Zionists betrayed Hitler once he had served their purpose, there are signs that a similar turn may be happening with Trump. The media’s relentless attacks, legal challenges, and the sudden withdrawal of financial support from previous Jewish donors suggest a coordinated effort to undermine his presidency. The Jewish elite, having positioned themselves within Trump’s inner circle, may now be leveraging their influence to destabilize his administration and align with the broader globalist agenda.
Is Trump One Step Ahead?

However, there is one key difference this time: Trump may be aware of the historical playbook and is positioning himself to counter the betrayal. Unlike Hitler, who was caught off guard by the sudden turn of his Jewish allies, Trump has repeatedly called out the “deep state,” the media, and globalist interests, signaling that he understands the forces at play. His recent moves to distance himself from certain advisors and his strategic pivots in foreign policy suggest that he might be preparing for the inevitable betrayal. If Trump can navigate these waters and maintain his base of support, the outcome of this modern conflict could diverge significantly from the tragic path of World War II.

Could History Be Altered?

While the patterns of infiltration, manipulation, and betrayal seem to be repeating, the key question remains: will Trump’s awareness and willingness to confront these forces lead to a different outcome? If he manages to outmaneuver the betrayal and rally nationalist support, he may change the course of history, preventing the escalation to a full-blown World War III. The stakes are higher than ever, and the world watches to see whether Trump can break the cycle and alter the future, proving that while history may rhyme, it does not have to repeat.

Final Thoughts: Future Proves Past

The parallels between the events leading up to World War II and the current geopolitical landscape are unmistakable. The same strategies of economic warfare, media manipulation, and betrayal are at play. If history truly repeats itself, then the world is on the brink of another devastating conflict, driven by the same forces that once sought the total destruction of Germany. As we look to the past, we see a reflection of the future—a cycle of power, control, and war that seems destined to continue unless the remnant awakens, realizes their power in Christ, prays, and ushers in the Second Coming of Jesus. This was ultimately prophesied in the Bible as the final resolution to this destructive cycle, where true justice and peace are restored, and the grip of the global elite is broken once and for all. The true hope lies not in human intervention alone, but in a divine awakening that transcends political maneuvering and ushers in the prophesied end to the patterns of deception and control that have plagued humanity for generations.