All of us here know that taxation is theft. The government takes part of what you earn and gives it to other people. If this isn’t theft, what is? Murray Rothbard showed this better than anyone, as I explained in my column a short time ago. In brief, ““For there is one crucially important power inherent in the nature of the State apparatus. All other persons and groups in society (except for acknowledged and sporadic criminals such as thieves and bank robbers) obtain their income voluntarily: either by selling goods and services to the consuming public, or by voluntary gift (e.g., membership in a club or association, bequest, or inheritance). Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion, by threatening dire penalties should the income not be forthcoming. That coercion is known as ‘taxation,’ although in less regularized epochs it was often known as ‘tribute.’ Taxation is theft, purely and simply, even though it is theft on a grand and colossal scale which no acknowledged criminals could hope to match. It is a compulsory seizure of the property of the State’s inhabitants, or subjects.”
Unfortunately, there are “court intellectuals” who think that theft is all right, and in this week’s column I’d like to discuss some of the drivel they put out. When you hear these ideas, you will probably think that nobody could take such stuff seriously, but these people are in deadly earnest. Here is what Rothbard says about the court intellectuals: ““It is instructive to inquire why it is that the State, in contrast to the highwayman, invariably surrounds itself with an ideology of legitimacy, why it must indulge in all these hypocrisies. The reason is that the highwayman is not a visible, permanent, legal, or legitimate member of society, let alone a member with exalted status. He is always on the run from his victims or from the State itself. But the State, in contrast to a band of highwaymen, is not considered a criminal organization; on the contrary, its minions have generally held the positions of highest status in society. It is a status that allows the State to feed off its victims while making at least most of them support, or at least be resigned to, this exploitative process. In fact, it is precisely the function of the State’s ideological minions and allies to explain to the public that the Emperor does indeed have a fine set of clothes. In brief, the ideologists must explain that, while theft by one or more persons or groups is bad and criminal, that when the State engages in such acts, it is not theft, but the legitimate and even sanctified act called ‘taxation.’”
…
Read Full Article Here…(lewrockwell.com)
Home | Caravan to Midnight (zutalk.com)
Live Stream + Chat (zutalk.com)





Be First to Comment