By Alan Stang
How will the conspiracy for world government complete the destruction of freedom of speech, which it must do to impose the totalitarian socialist world dictatorship that has always been its goal? Part of the answer is its present attempt to give control of the internet to the Communist UN. But that would merely destroy freedom to communicate, via the only medium still not controlled by the conspiracy. It would leave intact freedom of thought. Maybe you could no longer send it, but you still could think it, still could talk to yourself.
To prevent that, the conspiracy is conducting a literal reign of terror, as you know, in which the slightest public reference that could even fancifully be attributed to “homophobia,” to “racism,” to “sexism,” or some other ism—even if uttered by mistake—could be subjected to what atheist Lenin called “the fires of hell,” and then punished with job loss, divorce, public humiliation and mandatory brainwashing, etc.
It was I who coined the term “rockered” to describe the use of the technique on Atlanta Braves pitcher John Rocker, who made a trip to New York and then explained why he did not like what he saw. Rocker was “rockered,” publicly excoriated and subjected to brainwashing sessions. The landscape is littered with the figurative corpses of those who made similar mistakes, more proof that the KGB runs these united States. Thereby required to be Politically Correct, most people prudently keep their heads down and shut up.
Now comes an even deadlier application of the technique, the targets of which are generally known as “Holocaust Revisionists.” As best I can determine, there are three main kinds of these people. First, there are the complete coo-coos who say the thing called the Holocaust never happened; that no Jews were killed. They are Holocaust “deniers.” They say this while survivors with numbers on their arms are still walking around. The spaghetti-thin people wearing prison garb the invading U.S. Army discovered in the camps were apparently extras in a Steven Spielberg movie, according to this view.
Next is a group that says it happened, but that it was nowhere near as bad as Washington says it was. They are “revisionists.” Six million Jews were not killed, in this view. “Only” three, or four or even fewer than a million were killed. Could it be true? I don’t know, but if it is, I remain unimpressed. If “only” two million were killed would the horror be reduced by two-thirds? In our system, a man can be hanged, electrocuted or gas-chambered for killing one human being. So, we’re talking about a difference without a distinction and vice versa. It doesn’t deserve so much attention.
Finally, there are the writers who debate the minutiae surrounding the horror. Were there really gas jets at Auschwitz? Was the Holocaust physically possible? Did Hitler know? Were some of the guards Jews? Why and how did the Zionists collaborate with the Nazis? What is the meaning of orthodox Jewish anti-Zionism and the deadly conflict between Jews?
All of this is irrelevant, merely tangential, to my subject today. The conspiracy for world government is presently implementing an extremely malevolent tactic in which so-called “Holocaust deniers” are deported and thrown into jail. We are not talking about war criminals who participated in the horror, the perpetrators of some crime, but about people who write and talk about it.
A man named Ernst Zundel left Germany as a teenager, lived in Canada for many years, came to this country and married an American woman. Because he is a “Holocaust denier,” or a “revisionist,” the District of Criminals deported him back to Canada, which kept him in jail for a couple of years, then deported him to Germany. Presently, he is the defendant in a classic Soviet show trial, one highlight of which was the firing of his defense lawyers so the judge could appoint lawyers who will not defend, which makes no difference anyway, because no evidence will be allowed.
Another “Holocaust denier” or “revisionist” named Germar Rudolf is receiving similar treatment. One of the troubling aspects about all this is the fact that their “crimes” were committed in one country, by someone who lives in another country and will be tried in a third country. We saw an example of that a few years ago, in the attempt by a Socialist Spanish judge to jail Chilean President Augusto Pinochet in England, where he was living, for crimes allegedly committed in Chile.
Extradition used to be so well-settled a legal principle that it was required even to move an accused from one state to another inside this country, so he could be tried in the place where the crime was committed. That is still the case here, but it no longer applies in the tenuous connection between independent nations, the effect of which is to dilute that independence. Trying a crime where it was committed underlines the supremely important matter of venue, of place.
And now comes the latest in the series. English historian David Irving has been jailed in Austria, where he went on a one-day visit to make a speech. Irving faces ten years in prison because he too is a “Holocaust denier.” I have met David Irving only once, at an annual ABA (American Booksellers Association) Convention in Chicago where both of us had booths to promote our latest books…
READ FULL ARTICLE HERE… (etherzone.com)
Home | Caravan to Midnight (zutalk.com)
