US Politics and News Disgraced former FBI Director James Comey is once again the subject of a federal probe related to a classified leak that took place in 2016. Comey has already escaped indictment twice.
The first time was for leaking classified information related to the Trump Russian collusion hoax. The second time was when Inspector General Michael Horowitz failed to refer Comey for prosecution for criminally deceiving and perjuring himself 17 times on the Carter Page FISA warrants. Will this third investigation of Comeyâs malfeasance and misfeasance be the charm?
The latest Comey investigation stems from his July 2016 exoneration of Hillary Clinton. Rather than waiting for Attorney General Loretta Lynch to declare Clintonâs âinnocence,â Comey stole the limelight by holding a surprise press conference. That was when Comey declared that âno reasonable prosecutorâ would attempt to try a case against Hillary Clinton for negligently (or purposefully) leaking four yearsâ worth of classified State Department intelligence to China, Iran, North Korea, and every 10-year-old hacker in the Western hemisphere. No biggie!
A big question that many of us had at the time was âWhy?â What difference did it make whether Loretta Lynch exonerated Clinton in the sham investigation versus Comey?
At the time, we were told that it was because of the secret meeting that Lynch held with Bill Clinton on the tarmac at an Arizona airport the day before. None of us really believed that Lynch and âSlick Willieâ were just talking about their grandchildren, as they both claimed. But there was much more to Comeyâs decision than that.
Where does George Soros fit into this story? Let me back up a bitâŠ
Leonard Bernardo, an official with George Sorosâ Open Societies Foundation, had been in communication with DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-FL). George Soros had poured tens of millions of dollars into Hillary Clintonâs campaign coffers by that point.
Soros may have wanted to make sure his money wasnât going to go to waste due to an impending indictment of Hillary for treasonously violating the Espionage Act. Maybe Soros wanted to know if he needed to bribe anyone else to rig the outcome of the Clinton email investigation.
Anyway, Wasserman-Schultz wrote back to the Soros official, and this is what she told him in that email. Wasserman-Schultz reassured the Soros official that Loretta Lynch had personally told her that Hillary Clinton would be exonerated. George Soros had nothing to worry about!
The story starts to get weird now, so stay with me.
Hackers working for a Dutch intelligence agency got their hands on that email and sent it to the FBI. Loretta Lynch should have been slapped in handcuffs the moment that email surfaced. Instead, the FBI classified the email. The very existence of the email was classified, because our intelligence allies had hacked it from a political organization inside the US.
Yet James Comey later told reporters about the existence of that email, as part of his rambling and nonsensical rationale for holding his press conference exonerating Hillary. Comey told reporters he was worried that the (classified) email would taint the investigation.
Once again, the guy who was purportedly supposed to be investigating Hillary Clinton for mishandling classified intelligence⊠blurts out more classified intelligence to reporters.
Hereâs another point to make about this â and itâs not a small point.
Who were our Dutch intelligence allies hacking? Was it the Soros operative? Or, (more likely) was it Debbie Wasserman-Schultz who was the head of Democratic National Committee at the time? One of the most suppressed stories of the modern age is the fact that while all of this Clinton email stuff was going on, Wasserman-Schultz was embroiled in an email scandal of her own.
Her longtime Pakistani Muslim Brotherhood IT staffer, Imran Awan, had just been caught hacking more than 100 House Democratsâ computers, including the Democrats on committees that handle classified information. Wasserman-Schultzâs personal laptop was seized by Capitol Police as part of the investigation, which resulted in her explosively threatening consequences to the Police Chief in a congressional hearing.
We have been told for years that âRussia hacked our democracy,â by which Democrats and the media really meant that Russia hacked the DNC and John Podesta. Despite that claim, no proof has ever surfaced that any Russians were involved in the DNC hack. And weâre just now finding out that it may have been⊠the Dutch⊠who hacked the DNC?
Stay tuned, because weâll keep following this story in hopes that the Russian collusion kooks are finally indicted for their crimes against America.