By: Brendi Wells
Breaking news reveals a severe ethical breach by Kamala Harris, whose failure to disclose connections between her husband, Douglas Emhoff, and figures associated with U.S. voting machines raises fundamental questions about her eligibility to run for president.
_________________________________________________________________
The Uncovered Connections
Harris’s undisclosed connections trace back to Emhoff’s former boss, Sir Nigel Knowles, a knighted figure in the UK and founding director of SGO, Smartmatic’s parent company. Smartmatic is part of a network of companies—Dominion, ES&S, Sequoia, Diebold, OpTech—responsible for managing voting machines across key states like Nevada, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Michigan. Knowles and Lord Mark Malloch-Brown, another SGO director, are influential in the international sphere and are linked to allegations surrounding voting system integrity. Yet, despite her close ties to this network through her husband, Harris failed to disclose these relationships publicly.
What This Means for U.S. Democracy
Transparency is paramount for any candidate seeking the highest office. By hiding these connections, Harris has breached the public’s trust and left her ethics in serious question. These associations go beyond personal ties; they represent potential conflicts of interest that threaten election security and national sovereignty. If Harris’s husband has connections to the very voting systems that decide U.S. elections, this puts her in a position of divided loyalties—one that could undermine the democratic principles she claims to champion.
A Historical Context of Ethical Breaches
This level of conflict is unprecedented. Harris’s hidden links to British knighthood (Knowles was knighted in 2008) and to figures of the British Pilgrims Society suggest a possible intertwining of foreign influence with U.S. democratic functions. In 2014, Malloch-Brown and Knowles launched SGO with Antonio Mugica, Smartmatic’s CEO, in a move that consolidated their influence over election technologies worldwide. This connection is one Harris should have publicly accounted for, as her direct ties to individuals in control of voting technology appear to cross ethical boundaries.
Documents Reveal Overlooked Disclosures
Several public records—including Harris and Emhoff’s 2019 IRS Form 1040, Emhoff’s departure from DLA Piper in 2020, and an Executive Branch Public Financial Disclosure Report—reveal a concerning lack of transparency about these associations. The Smartmatic website removed pages referencing Malloch-Brown, Knowles, and their U.S. voting machine connections around November 2020, though archives such as the Wayback Machine retained the information, suggesting deliberate obfuscation of these relationships.
The Conclusion: Harris is Unfit to Run for President
Given the breadth of these concealed associations and their implications for national security, Kamala Harris’s connections present an indisputable conflict of interest. The American people deserve leaders with unimpeachable loyalty to democratic values, free from foreign or corporate ties that compromise their decision-making. Harris’s failure to disclose these affiliations is an ethics violation that, at the very least, disqualifies her from serving in high office.
Kamala Harris’s candidacy poses a risk to election integrity and national sovereignty. These facts demonstrate that she is not fit to run for the presidency of the United States.
Turns out Kamala actually worked at BurgerKing: home of the Whopper
Impressive work.
Everyone must read this.
I will push it out.
This is ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ award winning journalism!
Brendi, good job.