Press "Enter" to skip to content

Mass. Sanctuary City Judges Call Deportation of Illegals an ‘Affront to Justice’

ICE arrests two men who had been released by court officials despite detainer requests…

(Associated Press) Federal immigration officials in Massachusetts say a newly launched campaign to alert the public of immigrants living in the country illegally who have been released by local officials under sanctuary policies is having an impact.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Boston office said late Wednesday it arrested two men — one from Cape Verde and another from Colombia — who had been released by state court officLials while their criminal cases are pending.

The two men were among five people whose names, photos and criminal histories the agency released on Friday in an informational flyer akin to the FBI’s “most wanted” fugitive lists.

The federal agency has since added three more so-called immigration fugitives to the list, which also cites the local law enforcement agency that it says released the individual.

Todd Lyons, who heads the immigration agency’s Boston office, said the agency — along with other regional offices around the country — will be regularly releasing the information as a way to call attention to local policies that make immigration enforcement challenging.

“Sanctuary” policies generally limit the role police and other local law enforcement agencies play in immigration matters.

In Massachusetts, he cited a 2017 state Supreme Judicial Court ruling that determined local law enforcement officials don’t have to authority under state law to hold an individual solely on the basis of a federal civil immigration detainer, which is an administrative tool used by ICE to begin the deportation process.

“The politicization of law enforcement at any level whether it be federal, state, or local does not make anyone safer,” Lyons said in a statement announcing the new campaign Friday.

State judicial leaders responded Thursday by criticizing the immigration agency for continuing to deport immigrants awaiting trial, over the court’s objections.

A man awaiting trial for drug trafficking charges was recently deported to the Dominican Republic and now must be extradited if prosecutors want to pursue the criminal case, state Supreme Judicial Court Chief Justice Ralph Gants and Trial Court Chief Justice Paula Carey wrote in a letter to Lyon.

In October, the two justices had written to ICE citing 13 similar cases and asking that the agency at least give the state notice before deporting defendants.

“It certainly is an affront to justice,” Gants and Carey said in their Thursday letter.

The judiciary maintains it “neither helps nor hinders” the immigration agency in its enforcement efforts.

In prior statements, the court has said its officers do not interfere if immigration officials come to the courthouse with a detainer at the time a defendant is released from custody.

The immigration agency said Wednesday that the Brockton District Court denied its immigration detainer for the Cape Verdean man, who it said faces several charges of driving under the influence, assault with a dangerous weapon and threatening to bomb or hijack.

It also said the Chelsea District Court had denied its detainer request for the Colombian man, who the agency said faces assault with intent to rape and indecent assault and battery.

Boston is among a handful of cities, including San Francisco, New York and Chicago, where U.S. Customs and Border Protection tactical units are being deployed in the coming weeks to enhance ICE’s efforts.

“VIEW ARTICLE SOURCE…”

2 Comments

  1. GD Johnson GD Johnson February 21, 2020

    Any appointed official who takes an oath of office to uphold our Constitution that doesn’t comply with it, should immediately be removed from office for violating that oath. Calling law enforcement an affront to justice is a travesty to the rule of law. Its personal opinions of judges who obscure justice itself by imposing the will of their own biases based on whom they think have broken the law against those who’re sworn to uphold it that makes the entire DOJ obsolete in its ability to protect the rights of this nation’s citizens. Since when did following immigration laws become an affront to anything?

  2. JW Salthouse JW Salthouse February 21, 2020

    So upholding the law by deporting people who came into the country ILLEGALLY, is an affront to the law?
    This assertion is an affront to reality, the English language, & conmon sense. Just another judge that wants to legislate from the bench!

Comments are closed.

Breaking News: