By David Zukerman
In searching for media reaction to the denial by Hon. Mary S. Scriven, U.S. District Judge, Middle District of Florida, of Michael Flynn’s request for a temporary restraining order against the House January 6th Select Committee, I noticed this headline at the Law and Crime website:
‘Flynn Has Failed’: Federal Judge Immediately Rejects ex-National Security Advisor’s Motion to Halt Jan. 6 Committee Investigation
With the name Law and Crime, this article credited to Elura Nanos seemed to be an authoritative source for a take on this matter, involving Lt. General (ret.) Michael Flynn’s resistance to impressment by the Pelosi Very Select Jan. 6 Committee (Pelosi limited her selection to seven Trump-hating Democrats and two Trump-hating Republicans). Thereupon, I clicked the search result: to learn that this website is labeled “A Dan Abrams Production.”
Well, isn’t that interesting, I immediately thought. The TV legal commentator and son of attorney Floyd Abrams, has an online venue to reflect on Law and Crime. But can he resist tilting the scales of justice way over to the left?…READ FULL ARTICLE HERE… – American Thinker
