Press "Enter" to skip to content

NY Times Gives “2000 Mules” the Silent Treatment

NY Times Gives "2000 Mules" the Silent Treatment
NY Times Gives “2000 Mules” the Silent Treatment

By Real History Channel

D’Souza’s film is non-ideological and very normie-friendly. It is truly a “smoking gun” — without even touching upon what the machines may have been programmed to do. Normies aren’t quite ready for that aspect yet. That shoe may drop later on.

This and whatever other evidence which we expect to follow during this run-up to the November elections poses a real dilemma for the Slimes and all other Fake News. If the hired scribblers and talking heads attempt to “Fact Check” or “debunk” 2000 Mules, they will not only draw more attention to it, but also set themselves up to be revealed as dishonest in the eyes of the “centrist” normies now being exposed to the film. How can this be “debunked” when the after-hours criminal mules were caught on bloody film?!

The only response for the Slimes is, at least for now, a non-response — the lie of omission, the “blackest lie of all.” But simply pretending that 2000 Mules doesn’t exist also carries risk because Trump’s mighty bullhorn will not permit silence on the Abomination (actually a “Sting” operation) of 2020 which the usual suspects keep telling us to “move on” ™ from. Other media outlets are indeed taking the “Fact Check”™ and “Move On”™ approach — as the desperate headlines below illustrate…

Read More Here

News PDF Archives – Jellyfish.NEWS

Breaking News: