On the afternoon of June 9, 2013, Jeffrey Epstein’s personal Gmail account was, for roughly two hours, the operational center of a covert foreign policy apparatus serving the Gates Foundation. At 1:09 PM, former UN Under-Secretary-General Terje Rød-Larsen forwarded Epstein a classified field intelligence package on Taliban backchannel communications, ghost workers, and ghost children in Pakistan’s vaccination program. At 3:39 PM, Epstein forwarded the package to Bill Gates’s chief science advisor, Boris Nikolic. One minute later, Epstein wrote back to Rød-Larsen with a five-word reply: “bg will send 5 million to start.” He was committing Bill Gates’s money to a UN diplomat, outside any formal grant process, having just relayed Taliban intelligence to a foundation executive, on a Sunday, from a Gmail account.
Part 6 of the full Epstein Files Series documented the intelligence channel through which Terje Rød-Larsen routed field reports from Pakistan and Nigeria through Jeffrey Epstein’s personal Gmail to Bill Gates’s chief science advisor, Boris Nikolic. That article established the mechanism: what information moved, how fast, and who received it.
This installment, Part 13, documents what was being debated inside that channel — in the weeks before it became fully operational. The question it forces is not merely one of legal exposure. It is a question about who was actually running Gates Foundation field strategy in conflict zones, and on whose moral compass that strategy was calibrated.
Read and share the X thread dedicated to this article.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- The FCPA question. On March 5, 2013, Jeffrey Epstein asked Boris Nikolic whether the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act applies to foundation work in Afghanistan. Not a lawyer. Not the Gates Foundation’s legal counsel. Epstein. That routing tells you where decision-making authority actually resided.
- The Machiavelli position. The following day, Epstein asked: if paying tribal leaders is the only way to vaccinate children in Taliban territory — even knowing the money may buy weapons — is it justified? Nikolic said yes, invoking Machiavelli by name. His note on Gates: “Bill is much more reluctant/negative re this.” The covert apparatus had its own moral logic. Gates, by this account, was its most hesitant participant — not its architect.
Read Full Article Here… | Sayerji Substack
Home | Caravan to Midnight (zutalk.com)






Be First to Comment