Russia's response to S. Hers revelations: If negotiations fail, B. Putin will give a deadline of 72 hours before using nuclear weapons

warnews247.gr

“72 hours evacuate the population of the nuclear strike zones”

The first reaction we have from the “deep” Russian state to the revelations of the Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh that Biden gave the order to blow up the Russian Nord Stream pipelines.
Moscow, through a well-known Russian media, responds that “if the ongoing secret negotiations fail, then a 72-hour evacuation period will be given to areas and then the Russian Army will regularly launch nuclear weapons.”

Obviously the talk is about Western Ukraine.
The title of the Russian article is: 72 hours before the use of tactical nuclear weapons: what Russia should do after the traces of the US in the Nord Stream blow-up were revealed!
The article reads as follows:

“I would like to start today’s material with excerpts from Shoigu’s statement dated 07/02/2023:
– Businesses in the area of Ugledar and Bakhmut are developing successfully.
– Russian forces are grinding all weapons and equipment supplied to Ukraine on both delivery routes and combat positions.
– Ukrainian losses in January amounted to more than 6,500 military personnel, 26 aircraft, 7 helicopters, 341 tanks.
– Soledar, Kleshcheevka, Podgornoe, Krasnopolye, Blagodatnoe, Lobkovoe, Nikolaevka districts were liberated as a result of offensive actions of Russian troops.

Demilitarization of NATO

What you need to notice here is that we have already dealt with the Armed Forces of Ukraine for a year of combat, now the Russian Federation is demilitarizing NATO military equipment, 341 tanks per month, 26 aircraft, etc. How many tanks has NATO promised? in ukraine just now? 321; This is a month of work of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.

British Defense Secretary Ben Wallace said London would not immediately transfer fighter jets to Ukraine. Transporting any fighter jet can take “months,” he said. Instead, Britain has promised long-range missiles and drones.

The Kremlin believes that the supply of Western weapons to Ukraine testifies to the increasing involvement of some countries in the conflict and its transformation into a more painful one.

The Baltic Sea and the legendary Seymour Hearst

Meanwhile, strange things are happening across the ocean. And I was sure that sooner or later the truth would come out. All versions indicated that behind the blowing up of the Nord Streams were the British Special Boat Service (abbreviated as SBS) – a special forces unit of the Royal Navy of Great Britain, created back in 1940 under the name The “Special Boat Section of the British Army” (eng. Army Special Boat Section) for anti-terrorist operations at sea.

The sensational information was published on his website by the winner of the Pulitzer Prize (the highest award among journalists) Seymour Hers. The personality is legendary in the journalism community.
He received the Pulitzer Prize in 1970 for material exposing the American commandos who massacred the Vietnamese city of My Lai during the Vietnam War. The world then shuddered at the actions of the American army (it was a natural massacre).

In addition, Seymour Hersh is also the recipient of the National Council of Teachers of English’s 2004 George Orwell Award for “Outstanding Contribution to Candor and Clarity in the Public Language,” two National Magazine Awards, five George Polk Awards, and more than a dozen other awards and investigative journalism awards., making him a master of the genre.

Now 85 years old, he is descended from Lithuanian Jews who moved to America in the middle of the last century.
He published all his material based on information from anonymous sources, which he did not disclose. The CIA and the White House have long held a grudge against the freelance journalist who, in an era without blogs or Internet sites, profitably sold his sensational revelations to America’s leading media outlets.
He wrote about the Watergate scandal, how the secret services in 1974 were involved in political investigations, spying on anti-war activists, about the CIA’s covert war against Chile.

At the same time, in 1974, he published material on secret US intelligence anti-submarine operations, talking about a secret CIA operation to raise a sunken Soviet submarine from the bottom of the Pacific Ocean. He then promised CIA Director William Colby, who spoke with him, not to release this material until the end of the operation, and he kept his word.

What followed was a series of revelations. Thus, in 2004, it was Hers who first spoke about the torture of Iraqis at the infamous American prison Abu Ghraib, for which he received an angry reaction from the military and intelligence officers.

He then attacked the CIA, which, with President Bush Jr.’s approval, used illegal and harsh interrogation methods. And a year later, in January 2005, it was Hears who accused the United States of covert operations in Iran to identify targets for possible strikes and proved the involvement of Hillary Clinton, then US Secretary of State, in it.

And even years later, in his nineties, Seymour Hersh was the first to report the differences between the US intelligence community and President Donald Trump.
And now, he’s dropping a new ‘bombshell’ – a detailed account of who orchestrated the Nord Stream sabotage.

“Last summer, Navy divers, operating under the cover of a NATO exercise known as Baltops 22, planted remotely triggered explosive devices that destroyed three of the four Nord Stream pipelines three months later,” the journalist wrote on 8 February on his blog.

According to him, President Joe Biden decided to sabotage offshore pipelines for more than nine months (long before the start of the war in Ukraine). One of the key questions that faced the President of the United States was how to conduct the operation so as not to leave traces or transfer the arrows to someone else. In this, according to the journalist, his national security adviser Jake Sullivan helped.

The American journalist confirmed the authority of the source who gave him the information that formed the basis of the article about US involvement in the sabotage.
“This is a man who seems to know quite a bit about what’s going on. Of course, I won’t mention him,” Hers said in an interview with a TASS correspondent.

Critics often accuse Hersh of constantly referring to anonymous sources and some classified documents that were given to him. Thus, former US Defense Department spokesman Brian Whitman said:
“This reporter has a well-established and well-deserved reputation for making dramatic statements based on unverifiable, anonymous sources.”

As he said, during the preparation of the material, he also spoke with a representative of the CIA’s public relations department. At the same time, the journalist believes that the American government will
definitely deny participation in sabotage.
Naturally, the White House called the sensational material “a simple lie.”

Hers himself once admitted that he was responsible for every sentence of his articles. “Sometimes I change events, dates and places in certain ways to protect people,” he said. “But I can’t manipulate what I write.”
In short, it is already clear that Seymour Hersh is not a random figure here. This is a primary weapon. It remains only to find out who charged it and in whose interests it works.

Nikolai Patrushev, Secretary of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, has already distanced himself from these revelations, saying that he has no information about who could have organized these terrorist attacks.

Now let’s think why someone activated this case? Who he is, we don’t know, but we can guess. Undermining international infrastructure in international waters is a casus belli.

Americans can scream for a long time that Hersh is a Russian agent, but let’s first prove that the facts he reports are fake. We can pretend not to believe them, as Nikolai Patrushev did, or we can stoke the fire by enlisting the aggrieved German side for it.

We have the casus belli incident up our sleeve, we were attacked by the Americans.
All this gives us the right to use our nuclear weapons, according to our own doctrine of their application. But we don’t do that yet, trying to “break” our opponents in a friendly way. Here I would advise them not to forget the words of handsome Trump:

“Those who do not want it in the bad way, let them take into account that in the good way it will be worse!”

The game went on a collision course. All that you see now is an attempt to de-escalate by escalating the conflict. The board situation is nearing the end of the game and the sides bring out their main trumps, which they saved for the last minute. They are trying to improve their bargaining position.

The Kremlin is demonstrating its readiness to negotiate and secret negotiations are underway, you can be sure.

But, if a deal fails, the Kremlin will go all the way, to the point of using tactical nuclear weapons and strategic nuclear weapons.

The West does not believe in this.

When Moscow gives 72 hours to evacuate the population of the nuclear strike zones, they will believe it.
I hope we never come to that.”

ORIGINAL ARTICLE TRANSLATED FROM GREEK- WarNews247