Press "Enter" to skip to content

Some comparative notation on the differences between Western and Russian way to wage a war

By Claudio Resta of VT Italia

And the chance of cutting off Ukraine from its Black Sea coast as a realistically minimum acceptable target for Russia to stop

By the way just to begin with formal US war misconduct I believe that all US wars since the end of World War II have never been formally declared in violation of Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 Kellogg–Briand Pact of 1928.

About the present what annoys me most about the Atlantic mainstream narrative about the war in Ukraine is the biased and mendacious cowardice of the accusations being leveled at Russia.

In addition to the guilty because deliberate and willing ignorance of its prodromes and the double standards with which the ways in which Russia wages this war are not compared with the ways in which the US conducted the war in Japan, Korea, Vietnam, against Serbia, against Iraq and against Afghanistan.

It is not only a quantitative question in terms of number of victims but it is above all a qualitative question in the way post WWII wars were conducted.

With no regard for the lives of civilians on the part of the Americans, no matter how great the number of casualties; and, on the contrary, with a great sensitivity towards the lives of civilians guilty only of being on the wrong side by the Russians. Too much. So much so that unfortunately it will backfire in the cowardice of the Atlantic mainstream narrative on the war in Ukraine.

Because if the Russians had employed the weapons employed by the Americans in the same way that the Americans used them in the liberation of Ukraine, but even if it was called an invasion, why did the Americans not invade Iraq and Afghanistan?

Let it be said once and for all. I was saying Why if the Russians had used the weapons employed by the Americans in the same way that the Americans used them in the liberation of Ukraine: atomic (already in Hiroshima and Nagasaki), in Viet-Nam, Iraq and Afghanistan: high potential conventional bombs, phosphorus bombs, Napalm bombs, Cbu-72 Fae bombs, Blue-82 bombs, A10 tank killers (Highway of Death), fast bulldozers used as improper weapons to bury thousands of soldiers alive in the trenches in a single run …

The list of horrors seems to me to be sufficient.

Indeed, no, it seems fair to mention even the most crude and primitive non-technological weapons as it was in Afghanistan to close thousands of rebels by packing them into containers where they will die by asphyxiation in Mazar I Sharif…READ FULL ARTICLE HERE… Military Foreign Affairs Policy Journal for Clandestine Services

News PDF Archives – Jellyfish.NEWS

Breaking News: