By Ward Clark
Tuesday’s arguments before the Supreme Court on the issue of allowing “transgender girls,” or as they are better-known, boys, on girls’ sports teams, have concluded. While predictions are hard to make, especially about the future, there is a lot of post-argument talk about how things went. Granted, these are speculations, and the Court will probably not rule on this until sometime this summer, but there are a few broad indications that things may go well for the side of sanity in this matter. Two news outlets, the Associated Press and NPR, both seem to think a narrow decision in favor of the two states, Idaho and West Virginia, is to be expected. We might note that these outlets are generally inclined to support the transgender agenda.
The Supreme Court on Tuesday appeared ready to deal another setback to transgender people and uphold state laws barring transgender girls and women from playing on school athletic teams.
The court’s conservative majority, which has repeatedly ruled against transgender Americans in the past year, signaled during more than three hours of arguments it would rule the state bans don’t violate either the Constitution or the federal law known as Title IX, which prohibits sex discrimination in education…
READ FULL ARTICLE HERE… (redstate.com)
Home | Caravan to Midnight (zutalk.com)






Be First to Comment