By  Kyle Becker
The Biden administration suffered yet another legal defeat for one of its race-based policies.
Breaking WIN: Tennessee federal district court halts the @USDA racially discriminatory farm loan forgiveness program that excludes white farmers.
HUGE win for equality and the Constitution!
More analysis to come…..@MSLF #RuleofLaw #Constitution #Equality pic.twitter.com/JbEc8oK3Co
— SLF_Liberty (@slf_liberty) July 8, 2021
âBreaking WIN: Tennessee federal district court halts the USDA racially discriminatory farm loan forgiveness program that excludes white farmers,â the Southeastern Legal Foundation announced. âHUGE win for equality and the Constitution!â
The court issued a preliminary injunction to stop the farm loan forgiveness program from discriminating against white farmers.
The July 8th decision buttresses earlier defeats for the Biden administrationâs race-based farm aid program. In June, a Wisconsin judge put a halt to the program.
Milwaukee District Judge William Griesbach issued a temporary restraining order, noting the White farmers âare likely to succeed on the merits of their claimâ that the U.S. Department of Agricultureâs (USDA) âuse of race-based criteria in the administration of the program violates their right to equal protection under the law,â according to NBC News.
âThe obvious response to a government agency that claims it continues to discriminate against farmers because of their race or national origin is to direct it to stop: it is not to direct it to intentionally discriminate against others on the basis of their race and national origin,â Griesbach continued.
The USDA said it disagreed with the restraining order.
âWe respectfully disagree with this temporary order and USDA will continue to forcefully defend our ability to carry out this act of Congress and deliver debt relief to socially disadvantaged borrowers,â a USDA spokesperson told Fox News. âWhen the temporary order is lifted, USDA will be prepared to provide the debt relief authorized by Congress.â
It looks like another judge disagrees. It continues a string of legal defeats for Bidenâs race-based policies.
In May, racialized elements of the COVID-19 pandemic response, including a restaurant aid program within the American Rescue Plan, were defeated in the Sixth Circuit.
âThis case is about whether the government can allocate limited coronavirus relief funds based on the race and sex of the applicants,â Judge Thapar ruled. âWe hold that it cannot.â
As the SBAâs funding proceeded past the initial emergency funding phase, it continued to implement racial and sexual bias in its decisions.
âThere is an obvious solution to this of course: The agency can simply fund grants in the order they were receivedâwithout regard to priority status, and without regard to the processing head start that many applications received on the basis of race and sex,â the ruling noted.
Judge Thaparâs conclusion is particularly stinging.
âIt has been twenty-five years since the Supreme Court struck down the race-conscious policies in Adarand. And it has been nearly twenty years since the Supreme Court struck down the racial preferences in Gratz. As todayâs case shows once again, the âway to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.ââ
It looks like the Biden administration hasnât quite yet got the message. Slowly, with enough court defeats, one would think that it might.
NOW READ: