Press "Enter" to skip to content

The 3 Symbols of 666 Revealed!

  • Step 1: Pray,
  • Step 2: Read entire article, including all videos & links to view all proof/documentation,
  • Step 3: Pray again and fast.

Rev. 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

First it’s important to understand that numbers as we see them today, 0123456789, did not exist 2,000 years ago when John wrote the Book of Revelation. The numbers we use today are called “Hindu Arabic Numbers“. They were first invented by the Hindu’s in India. Then they were adopted by the Muslim Arabs, and then the Catholic Church and Europe. All of this is well documented history. Each time that they moved to another group of people and over time, the numbers changed in appearance. In John’s lifetime, the Hindu numbers were used only in India (and perhaps China) and looked much different than they do today. During John’s lifetime, in Israel and the Roman Empire, they would write numbers four possible ways.

  1. Write them out with complete words. All of the numbers in the scriptures were originally written with complete words, such as when John wrote “hexakosioi” for six hundred in Rev.14:20. He wrote “hexekonta” for sixty in Rev.11:3 and 12:6. He wrote “hex” for six in Rev.4. Yet in Rev.13:18, he did not write “hexakosioi hexekonta hex” which is what he would have written for 666 following the pattern of his writing style of always writing out the complete word for all numbers.
  2. They used Roman Numerals. The Roman Numerals for 666 would be DCLXVI. This is not what John wrote in Rev.13:18.
  3. They would use “Hebrew Numerals” which were ancient Assyrian Aramaic letters and each letter represented a number, similar to the Roman system, but using a different language. This is not what John wrote in the scriptures.
  4. Greek numerals. Similar to the Hebrew Numerals except using the Greek letters. This is what most people claim that John wrote. However, that’s impossible and this is why: In his lifetime, the Hindu numbers, used only in India at that time, for 666 would look something similar to three fours Source, Look at first century AD picture. If he saw the modern Hindu Arabic “666” or the ancient Hindu numbers “444”, he would not recognize it as numbers. He would not know what he was seeing or how to translate it into his Greek, Aramaic or Roman. If he had seen “666”, the only way that he could write it would be to just copy it down the way that he saw it, thus he would have written the modern number “666”. Yet he did not do that. He did not write “666” with Hindu-Arabic numbers, the way they look today, nor how they were written in India in his lifetime.

John was having a vision of the end times, our time. Why would John write 666 with three ancient Greek letters?, when in these end times, the time he was seeing in the vision, we are using a modern European form of the Hindu-Arabic numbers.

Most people claim that we should add up the letters of a man’s name, the person that we will know as “the antichrist”, & that name will add up to 666. That’s called “Gematria”, a sort of “Bible Code”, the practice of using letters for numbers & adding them. It is a false theory & decoy/trap. Gematria is ancient Assyrian, Babylonian witchcraft. There is absolutely no proof that Jesus, the disciples, apostles or prophets used Gematria or any other form of Bible Code. It is my personal experience that every instance of bible code revelations & Gematria are deceptions.

Let’s look at what John wrote, according to Strong’s Concordance.

Let’s start with the word “count” in Rev.13:18: Strong’s G5585 – psephizo. From G5586 1) to count with pebbles, to compute, calculate, reckon, to determine 2) to give one’s vote by casting a pebble into the urn 3) to decide by voting

 

Now let’s look at Strong’s for the word “number“: Strong’s G706 – arithmos. From G142 1) a fixed and definite number, 2) an indefinite number, a multitude. KJV (18) – number, 18; NAS (18) – group, 1; number, 17; Acts 5:36 Translated as “group” in the New American Standard Bible.

G706 in the bible always refers to a group of people. Never does G706 refer to an actual number in the bible.

Since this Greek word never refers to an actual number in scripture, we must not assume that it is referring to an actual number.

 

Now let’s look at the Strong’s word for “man“: Strong’s G444 – anthrōpos From G435 and G3700; man-faced, i.e. a human being (a group of human beings) 1) a human being, (even females or males either one) a) generically, to include all human individuals, the human race. This is a different Greek word from what is used in scripture for a male!

Since this Greek word is not referring to a male, but rather mankind, the human race, we must embrace that this is not referring directly to one man, “the antichrist”, as taught by traditional doctrines of man. Therefore, it’s impossible for this to be telling us to add up the letters of one man’s name. It’s impossible for this to be telling us to add letters and/or numbers to determine the name of the Son of Perdition (the antichrist).

So basically we have so far:

Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding determine the multitude of the beast: for it is a multitude of mankind; and his multitude is…

So now let’s look at “666” in Strong’s Concordance: Strong’s G5516 – “chi-xi-stigma χξϚ Transliteration chi-xi-stigma Root Word (Etymology) The ἄγαμος 22nd, ἀγαθοεργέω 14th and an obsolete letter (4742 as a cross) of the Greek alphabet (intermediate between the ἀββα 5th and Ἄβελ 6th), used as numbers.”

Notice it says the x looking symbol is the 22nd letter of the Greek alphabet. This is the number of double judgment. Then it says the middle character is the 14th letter. The number 14 is what God showed me concerning March 14th, 2008 which was one of the first prophecies God gave me. So both these numbers are relevant to the opening of understanding of prophecy. Strong’s says that the 3rd letter is the “stigma”. “Stigma” means “mark” or badge of servitude! So instead of the 3rd character being a number, it’s actually saying that the other 2 characters represent the mark!

In all other places in the bible, numbers are spelled with words, not symbols. For example, the number 600 in Rev. 14:20 is ἑξακόσιοι, the number 60 in Rev. 12:6 is ἑξήκοντα, the number 6 in Rev. 4:8 is ἕξ. Rev. 13:18 is the only place in the bible where these symbols are used! Even though the numbers 600, 60 and 6 are found in the bible in many places!

 

Now let’s look at 666 in the Codex Vaticanus:

The picture below is of 666 in the Codex Vaticanus, which is the oldest most complete bible manuscript on Earth. The Dead Sea Scrolls are older, but they are unreliable due to their corrupt Assyrian Aramaic origins and association with wicked magic books. The Dead Sea Scrolls are unreliable also due to the fact that they are in so many tiny fragments and we cannot trust whether humans have correctly pieced the fragments back together accurately. The most reliable ancient bible manuscripts are in Greek and much more complete rather than tiny fragments. The Codex Vaticanus is the most accurate and most trust worthy ancient bible manuscript available to us. The Codex Vaticanus is an important manuscript from 350 A.D. It contains a copy of the Greek Septuagint Old Testament which is the version of the bible that Jesus and the Apostles actually used, plus the New Testament. The Codex Vaticanus is the oldest complete bible in existence. In 2013, God revealed to me the fact about it being a copy of the Greek Septuagint which is actually a restoration of the original Hebrew scriptures. From Hebrews 9:13 to the end of the Book of Revelation the document had to be restored due to damage. This is very common among ancient manuscripts. These books were in the original Codex Vaticanus. Because that Hebrews 9:13 to Revelation was so heavily damaged, they had to make replica’s using all of the possible fragments plus all of the other available oldest fragments of other manuscripts and all other possible resources to complete the most accurate replica possible of Hebrews 9:13 to Revelation. Then replaced that section which was damaged. They did an excellent job doing so! Jesus showed me that it’s extremely accurate to the original. He will tell you the same thing if you truly seek with a real heart for truth. You can view the page that includes 666 in Rev. 13:18 by clicking here. The image can also be verified by going to the Vaticanus website at http://digi.vatlib.it/view/MSS_Vat.gr.1209 (page 1530, right column, fifth line from top). This bible was not written by the Vatican, nor by Catholics. It is called “Vaticanus” only because of its present location. The Vatican is holding many ancient manuscripts hostage. This codex was not written in Latin. We have no reason to not trust this manuscript. The evidence is overwhelming that the Roman Catholic church added to and took away from scripture mostly after this codex was already written. Jesus has confirmed this bible to me many times.

Now let’s look at 666 in Rev.13:18, of the Codex Vaticanus and compare it to to some very common symbols!… READ MORE.. (isawthelightministries.com)

News PDF Archives – Jellyfish.NEWS

One Comment

  1. Duncan Adams Duncan Adams October 26, 2021

    Interesting …. yeah I got slammed( in telegram ) for not accepting that the beast was a man and I pointed out that revelation is highly symbolic ( As per old John dyle KFYI talk host from years ago ) – that is it a SYSTEM
    Wana bet that as time goes on someone is gonna publish that Rapture ” is NoT in the bible and the current idea that people are gonna teleport to heaven … ain’t gonna happen .

Comments are closed.

Breaking News: