
By Fabio G. C. Carisio
Table of Contents
Denying inconvenient facts about the events of September 11, 2001 has brought us to the brink of nuclear war
Seek Truth From Facts is your one-stop online resource to be smarter and well-informed, in the face of the West’s relentless Judeo-Big Lie Propaganda Machine!
Originally published by Jeff Brown on his Substack
All links to previous Gospa News investigations below have been added in the aftermath by virtue of the ties with topics covered
Richard Nixon’s Principal Foreign Policy Adviser, deputy director for planning U.S. National Security Council, co-founder Center for Strategic and International Studies, Dr. Robert Dickson Crane wrote that the FREE ebook, 9/11 UNVEILED is the “best short summary of what most Americans and virtually all of the rest of the world consider to be the ‘9/11 mystery’ (70 pages).”
FREE ebook, 9/11 UNVEILED
9/11 UNVEILED and supporting evidence are archived at the International Criminal Court. Available evidence does not support the claim that AA Flight 77 struck the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. Debris found at the Pentagon has not been traced to American Airlines Flight 77. Serial Numbers on parts found should have been matched with those in American Airlines logbooks — maintained pursuant to the Code of Federal Regulations.
9/11 Unveiled is divided into 10 sections: Attack, Response; Pretexts and Coverups; Bin Laden; The Hijackers; One, Two World Trade Center; 7 World Trade Center; The Achilles Heel; Flight 93; The Pentagon; Boomerang.
Declassified Guantanamo Court Filing Suggests some 9/11 Hijackers were CIA Agents
“The 9/11 Commission Report”: not an investigation.
The 9/11 Commission Chair Thomas H. Kean and Vice Chair Lee H. Hamilton wrote in their book Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission that they were “setup to fail”. 3000+ American patriots question 9/11.
“The 9/11 Commission Report” was prepared by Professor Philip Zelikow whose expertise includes the creation of myth. Available evidence contradicts Zelikow’s narrative. It reads like a novel — not the report of an investigation.

According to the “most influential English language philosopher of the nineteenth century” John Stuart Mill (1806-73):
He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them. But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion. . . Nor is it enough that he should hear the opinions of adversaries from his own teachers, presented as they state them, and accompanied by what they offer as refutations…
READ FULL ARTICLE HERE… (vtforeignpolicy.com)
Home | Caravan to Midnight (zutalk.com)
Be First to Comment