Press "Enter" to skip to content

Transmission Electron Microscopy Reveals Graphene Oxide in COVID-19 Vaccines

Transmission Electron Microscopy Reveals Graphene Oxide in COVID-19 Vaccines
Transmission Electron Microscopy Reveals Graphene Oxide in COVID-19 Vaccines

By State of the Nation

Phase Contrast Microscopy, Transmission Electron Microscopy and Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy Reveal the Ingredients in the CoV-19 Vaccines!

Robert O Young DSc, PhD, Naturopathic Practitioner

Germs Are Born In Us and From Us as an Outfection and NOT an Infection of the Body Cells. In other words germs are symptoms of cellular and genetic disorganization and NOT the specific cause of the cellular and genetic disorganization! The GERM is NOTHING and the TERRAIN is EVERYTHING and can only contribute to a state of toxic imbalance but cannot cause ANY specific sickness or disease! – Dr. Robert O. Young

In Figure 1 You Can See What A Cluster Bomb of Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) Looks Like in the Live Unstained Human Blood after an CoV-19 Inoculation and Causing Pathological Blood Coagulation![1][2]

Figure 1 is a Micrograph of a Carbon Cluster of Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) Viewed in the Live Unstained Human Blood with pHase Contrast Microscopy at 1500x. Note that the Red Blood Cells are Clotting in and Around the rGO Crystal in a Condition Known as Rouleau! A French Word Which Means to Chain.

What Are the Non-Disclosed Ingredients Contained in CoV – 19 So-Called Vaccines?

To answer this question an aqueous fraction of the Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen were taken from each vile and then viewed separately under phase contrast microscopy at 100x, 600x up to1500x magnification showing reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) particulates which were compared to micrographs of rGO from Choucair et al, 2009 for identification and verification.[3]

 

The Pfizer “Vaccine” Non-disclosed Ingredients

The micrographs in Figures 2 and 3 were obtained using 100X, 600X and 1500X pHase Contrast, Dark Field and Bright Field Optical Microscopy.[3]

 

On the left of each micrograph you will view micrographs obtained from the Pfizer vaccine aqueous fraction containing rGO.

 

On the right of each micrograph you will view a match from known sources containing rGO for anatomical validation.

Figure 2 shows an aqueous fraction image from Pfizer vaccine sample (left) and from reduced graphene oxide (rGO) standard (right) (Sigma-777684). Optical microscopy, 100X

Figure 3 – Aqueous fraction images containing reduced graphene oxide from Pfizer vaccine sample (left) and sonicated reduced graphene oxide (rGO) standard (right) (Sigma-777684). Optical pHase contrast microscopy, 600X

Using Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) we observed an intricate matrix or mesh of folded translucent flexible rGO sheets with a mixture of darker multilayer agglomerations and lighter colored of unfolded monolayers as seen in Figure 4. [3]

Figure 4 shows a cluster of graphene nanoparticles in a Pfizer vaccine. They appear to be aggregated.

The darker linear areas in Figure 4 appear to be local overlap of sheets and local arrangement of individual sheets in parallel to the electron beam.[4]

 

After the mesh, a high density of unidentified rounded and elliptical clear shapes appears, possibly corresponding to holes generated by mechanical forcing of the rGO mesh during treatment as seen in Figure 5.[4]

Figure 5 shows a TEM microscopy observation where particles of reduced graphene oxide in a Pfizer” vaccine” are present. The X-ray diffractometry reveals their nature of crystalline Carbon-based nanoparticles of rGO

Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy Reveals rGO in Pfizer Vaccine[5][6][7]

 

The Pfizer vaccine liquid fraction was then analyzed for chemical and elemental content using Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) as seen in Figure 5. The EDS spectrum showed the presence of Carbon, Oxygen verifying the rGO and Sodium-Chloride since the sample shown in Figures 2, 3, 4 and 5 were diluted in saline solution.

Figure 6 shows an EDS spectrum of a Pfizer “vaccine” under an ESEM microscopy coupled with an EDS x-ray microprobe (X axis =KeV, Y axis = Counts) identifying Carbon, Oxygen, Sodium and Chloride

The Quantification of mRNA in the Pfizer Vaccine

 

The quantification of RNA in the Pfizer sample was carried out with conventional protocols (Fisher).

 

According to NanoDropTM 2000 spectrophotometer calibration check specific software (Thermofisher), the UV absorption spectrum of total aqueous fraction was correlated to 747 ng/ul of unknown absorbing substances.

 

However, after RNA extraction with commercial kit (Thermofisher), quantification with RNA specific Qbit fluorescence probe (Thermofisher) showed that only 6t ug/ul could be related to the presence of RNA. The spectrum was compatible with the peak of rGO at 270nm.

 

According to microscopic images presented here, most of this absorbance might be due to graphene-like sheets, abundant in the fluids suspension in the sample.

 

The conclusions are further supported by high fluorescence from the sample with maximum at 340 nm, in accordance with peak values for rGO. It must be reminded that RNA does not show spontaneous fluorescence under UV exposure.

Figure 7 – UV spectrum of aqueous fraction of Pfizer vaccine sample.[1][2][3][4][5]


Ultra Violet Fluorescence Testing of the Pfizer Aqueous Fraction for Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO)[5]

 

Ultra Violet absorption and fluorescence spectra were obtained with Cytation 5 Cell Imaging Multi-Mode Reader Spectrophotometer (BioteK). UV absorbance spectrum confirmed a maximum peak at 270nm, compatible with presence of rGO particulate.

 

UV fluorescence maximum at 340 nm also suggests presence of significant amounts of rGO in the sample (Bano et al, 2019).

Figure 8 – UV absorption and fluorescence spectra were obtained with Cytation 5 Cell Imaging Multi-Mode Reader Spectrophotometer (BioteK). UV absorbance spectrum confirmed a maximum peak at 270 nm, compatible with presence of rGO. UV fluorescence maximum at 340 nm also suggests presence of significant amounts of rGO in the sample (Bano et al, 2019).

Figure 9 – The spectroscopy UV analysis showed an adsorption due to the presence of reduced graphene oxide, which is confirmed by observation under ultraviolet visible microscopy.

Figures 10 and 11 below shows a micrograph of different micro and nano particulates which have been identified in the Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen, so-called “vaccines” and analyzed under an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope coupled with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive System that reveals the chemical nature of the observed micro and nano particulates viewed.[5][6][7]

Figure 10 shows sharp micron debris of 20 um in length identified in the Pfizer so-called “vaccine” containing Carbon, Oxygen Chromium, Sulphur, Aluminum, Chloride, Nitrogen.

Figure 11 shows a 20 micron in length particulate identified in the so-called Pfizer “vaccine”. It is composed of carbon, oxygen chromium, sulphur, aluminum, chloride and nitrogen.


Figures 12 and 13
 below shows a micrograph of different micro and nano particulates which have been identified in the Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen, so-called “vaccines” and analyzed under an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope coupled with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive System that reveals the chemical nature of the observed micro and nano particulates.

Are There Parasites in the Pfizer “Vaccines”?

A 50 micron elongated body, as seen in Figure 12 is a sharp mysterious presence in the Pfizer vaccine. It appears and is identified anatomically as a Trypanosoma cruzi parasite of which several variants are lethal and is one of many causes of acquired immune deficiency syndrone or AIDS.[Atlas of Human Parasitology, 4th Edition, Lawrence Ash and Thomas Orithel, pages 174 to 178][8]

Figure 12 shows a Trypanosoma Parasite approximately 20 microns in length found in the so-called Pfizer “vaccine”. It is composed of carbon, oxygen chromium, sulphur, aluminum, chloride and nitrogen.

Figure 13 identifies a composition of nano particulates including carbon, oxygen chromium, sulphur, aluminum, chloride and nitrogen also found in the CoV-19 “vaccines.”

Figure 13

Figures 14 and 15 below show a micrograph of different micro and nano particulates which have been identified and analyzed under an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope coupled with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive System that reveals the chemical nature of the observed micro and nano particulates.

 

The white 2-micron-long particulate is composed of bismuth, carbon, oxygen, aluminum, sodium, copper and nitrogen.

Figure 14 shows nano and micron particulates identified in the Pfizer “vaccine”. The white 2 micron long particulate is composed of bismuth, carbon, oxygen, aluminum, sodium, copper and nitrogen.

Figure 15 shows that the white 2 micron particulate found in the so-called Pfizer ‘vaccine’ is composed of bismuth, carbon, oxygen, aluminum, sodium, copper and nitrogen.

Figures 16 and 17 show the identification of organic carbon, oxygen and nitrogen particulates with an aggregate of embedded nanoparticles including bismuth, titanium, vanadium, iron, copper, silicon and aluminum which were all found in the so-called Pfizer “vaccine.”

Figure 16 – shows an organic (Carbon-Oxygen-Nitrogen) aggregate with embedded nanoparticles of bismuth, titanium. vanadium. iron, copper, silicon, aluminum embedded in Pfizer “vaccine!”

References

 

[1] Ou, L., Song, B., Liang, H. et al. Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms. Part Fibre Toxicol13, 57 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y

 

[2] Young RO (2016) Pathological Blood Coagulation and the Mycotoxic Oxidative Stress Test (MOST). Int J Vaccines Vaccin 2(6): 00048. DOI: 10.15406/ijvv.2016.02.00048

 

[3] Xu et al, (2019) Identification of graphene oxide and its structural features in solvents by optical microscopy, RSC Adv., 9, 18559-18564

 

1-Extracction RNA Kit https://www.fishersci.es/shop/products/ambion-purelink-rna-mini-kit7/10307963

 

2- NanoDropℱ https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/ND-2000#/ND-2000

 

3- QUBIT2.0: https://www.thermofisher.com/es/es/home/references/newsletters-andjournals/bioprobes-journal-of-cell-biology-applications/bioprobes-issues-2011/bioprobes-64-april2011/the-qubit-2-0-fluorometer-april-2011.html

 

[4] Kim et al, Seeing graphene-based sheets, Materials Today,Volume 13, Issue 3,2010,Pages 28- 38,ISSN 1369-7021,https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(10)70031-6

 

[5] Bano, I. et al , 2019. Exploring the fluorescence properties of reduced graphene oxide with tunable device performance,Diamond and Related Materials,Volume 94,59-64,ISSN 0925- 9635,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2019.02.021.

 

[6] Biroju, Ravi & Narayanan, Tharangattu & Vineesh, Thazhe Veettil. (2018). New advances in 2D electrochemistry—Catalysis and Sensing. 10.1201/9781315152042-7.

 

[7] Choucair, M., Thordarson, P. & Stride, J. Gram-scale production of graphene based on solvothermal synthesis and sonication. Nature Nanotech 4, 30–33 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.365

 

[8] Atlas of Human Parasitology, 4th Edition, Lawrence Ash and Thomas Orithel, pages 174 to 178

 

[9] Mano, S.S.; Kanehira, K.; Sonezaki, S.; Taniguchi, A. Effect of Polyethylene Glycol Modification of TiO2 Nanoparticles on Cytotoxicity and Gene Expressions in Human Cell Lines. Int. J. Mol. Sci.2012, 13, 3703-3717. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13033703

 

[10] Srivastava AK, Dwivedi N, Dhand C, et al. Potential of graphene-based materials to combat COVID-19: properties, perspectives, and prospects. Mater Today Chem. 2020;18:100385. doi:10.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100385

 

[11] Young, RO, “The Effects of ElectroMagnetic Frequencies (EMF) on the Blood and Biological Terrain.” https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/the-effects-electromagnet-frequencies-on-the-blood-and-biological-terrain

 

[16] Gatti AM, Manti A, Valentini L, Montanari S, Gobbi P, et al. (2016) Nano biointeraction of particulate matter in the blood circulation. Frontiers 30: 3.

 

[13] Nikazar, S., Sivasankarapillai, V.S., Rahdar, A. et al. Revisiting the cytotoxicity of quantum dots: an in-depth overview. Biophys Rev 12, 703–718 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-020-00653-0

 

[14] Ritesh Banerjee, Priya Goswami, Manoswini Chakrabarti, Debolina Chakraborty, Amitava Mukherjee, Anita Mukherjee, Cadmium selenide (CdSe) quantum dots cause genotoxicity and oxidative stress in Allium cepa plants, Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, Volume 865, 2021, 503338,ISSN 1383-5718, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503338.

 

[15] Wanjun Cao, Lin He, Weidong Cao, Xiaobing Huang, Kun Jia, Jingying Dai, Recent progress of graphene oxide as a potential vaccine carrier and adjuvant, Acta Biomaterialia, Volume 112, 2020, Pages 14-28, ISSN 1742-7061, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.009. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1742706120303305)

 

[16] Concise Encyclopedia of Composite Materials, ed. Anthony Kelly, MIT Press, 1989, ISBN0-262-11145-4

 

[17] L. Harivardhan Reddy, JosĂ© L. Arias, Julien Nicolas, and Patrick Couvreur, “Magnetic Nanoparticles: Design and Characterization, Toxicity and Biocompatibility, Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Applications.” Chemical Reviews 2012 112 (11), 5818-5878 DOI: 10.1021/cr300068p

 

[18] US Dpt of health and human services (1996) Report Update: Vaccine Side Effects, Adverse Reactions, Contraindications, and Precautions. CDC 45(RR-12): 1-35.

 

[19] Ottaviani G, Lavezzi AM, Matturri L (2006) Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) shortly after hexavalent vaccination: pathology in suspected SIDS? Virchows Arch 448(1): 100-104.

 

[20] Taylor B, Miller E, Farrington CP, Petropoulos MC, Favot-Mayaud I, et al. (1999) Autism and measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: no epidemiological evidence for a causal association. Lancet 353(9169): 2026-2029.

 

[21] Demicheli V, Rivetti A, Debalini MG, Di Pietrantonj C (2012) Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 15(2): CD004407. New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination 13/13 Copyright: ©2016 Gatti et al. Citation: Gatti AM, Montanari S (2016) New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination. Int J Vaccines Vaccin 4(1): 00072. DOI: 10.15406/ijvv.2017.04.00072

 

[22] Carola Bardage, Ingemar Persson, Åke Örtqvist, Ulf Bergman, Jonas F Ludvigsson, et al. (2011) Neurological and autoimmune disorders after vaccination against pandemic influenza A (H1N1) with a monovalent adjuvanted vaccine: population based cohort study in Stockholm, Sweden. BMJ 343: d5956.

 

[23] Johann Liang R (2012) Updating the Vaccine Injury Table following the 2011 IOM Report on Adverse Effects of vaccines. HRSA, pp. 1-27.

 

[24] L Tomljenovic, CA Shaw (2011) Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants: Are they Safe? Current Medicinal Chemistry 18(17): 2630-2637.

 

[25] Shaw CA, Petrik MS (2009) Aluminum hydroxide injections lead to motor deficits and motor neuron degeneration. J Inorg Biochem 103(11): 1555-1562.

 

[26] Authier FJ, Sauvat S, Christov C, Chariot P, Raisbeck G, et al. (2006) AlOH3-adjuvanted vaccine-induced macrophagic myofasciitis in rats is influenced by the genetic background. Neuromuscul Disord 16(5): 347-352.

 

[27] Exley C, Esiri MM (2006) Severe cerebral congophilic angiopathy coincident with increased brain aluminium in a resident of Camelford, Cornwall, UK. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77(7): 877- 879.

 

[28] Wills MR, Savory J (1985) Water content of aluminium, dialysis dementia, and osteomalacia. Environ Health Perspect 63: 141-147.

 

[29] Brinth L, Pors K, Theibel AC, Mehlsen J (2015) Suspected side effects to the quadrivalent human papilloma vaccine. Danish Medical J 62(4): 1-12.

 

[30] Palmieri B, Poddighe D, Vadalà M, Laurino C, Carnovale C, et al. (2016) Severe somatoform and dysautonomic syndromes after HPV vaccination: case series and review of literature. Immunol Res.

 

[31] Visani G, Manti A, Valentini L, Canonico B, Loscocco F, et al. (2016) Environmental nanoparticles are significantly over-expressed in acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Res 50: 50-56.

 

[32] Artoni E, Sighinolfi GL, Gatti AM, Sebastiani M, Colaci M, et al. (2016) Micro and nanoparticles as possible pathogenetic co-factors in mixed cryoglobulinemia. Occupational Medicine.

 

[33] T Hansen, L Klimek, F Bittinger, I Hansen, A Gatti, et al. (2008) Mast cell reiches Aluminium granuloma Pathologe 29(4): 311-313.

 

[34] Gatti AM, Manti A, Valentini L, Montanari S, Gobbi P, et al. (2016) Nano biointeraction of particulate matter in the blood circulation. Frontiers 30: 3.

 

[35] Tenzer S, Docter D, Rosfa S, Wlodarski A, Kuharev J, et al. (2011) Nanoparticle size is a critical physicochemical determinant of the human blood plasma corona: a comprehensive quantitative proteomic analysis. ACS Nano 5(9): 7155-167.

 

[36] Radauer Preiml , Andosch A, Hawranek T, Luetz-Meindl U, Wiederstein M, et al. (2015) Nanoparticle-allergen interactions mediate human allergic responses: protein corona characterization and cellular responses. Fibre toxicology 13: 3.

 

[37] Cedervall T, Lynch I, Lindman S, BerggÄrd T, Thulin E, et al. (2016) Understanding the nanoparticle-protein corona using methods to quantify exchange rates and affinities of proteins for nanoparticles. PNAS 104 (7): 2050-2055.

 

[38] Lynch I, Cedervall T, Lundqvist M, Cabaleiro-Lago C, Linse S, et al. (2007) The nanoparticle-protein complex as a biological entity; a complex fluids and surface science challenge for the 21st century. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 134-135: 167-174.

 

[39] Gatti AM, Quaglino D, Sighinolfi GL (2009) A Morphological Approach to Monitor the Nanoparticle-Cell Interaction. International Journal of Imaging and Robotics 2: 2-21.

 

[40] Urban RM, Jacobs JJ, Gilbert JL, Galante JO (1994) Migration of corrosion products from modular hip prostheses. Particle microanalysis and histopathological findings. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 76(9): 1345-1359.

 

[41] Kirkpatrick CJ, Barth S, Gerdes T, Krump-Konvalinkova V, Peters (K 2002) Pathomechanisms of impaired wound healing by metallic corrosion products. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 6(3): 183-190.

 

[42] Lee SH, Brennan FR, Jacobs JJ, Urban RM, Ragasa DR, et al. (1997) Human monocyte/macrophage response to cobalt-chromium corrosion products and titanium particles in patients with total joint replacements. J Orthop Res 15(1): 40-49.

 

[43] Shaw CA, Seneff S, Kette SD, Tomljenovic L, Oller Jr JW, et al. (2014) Aluminum-Induced Entropy in Biological Systems: Implications for Neurological Disease. Journal of Toxicology 2014: 491316.

 

[44] Shaw CA, Kette SD, Davidson RM, Seneff S (2013) Aluminumℱs Role in CNS-immune System Interactions leading to Neurological Disorders. Immunome Research 9: 069.

 

[45] Seneff S, Swanson N, Chen Li (2015) Aluminum and Glyphosate Can Synergistically Induce Pineal Gland Pathology: Connection to Gut Dysbiosis and Neurological Disease. Agricultural Sciences 6(1): 42- 70.

 

[46] Pegaz B, Debefve E, Ballini JP, Konan-Kouakou YN, van den Bergh HJ (2006) Effect of nanoparticle size on the extravasations and the photothrombic activity of meso(p-tetracarboxyphenyl)porphyrin. J Photochem Photobiol B 85(3): 216-222.

 

[47] Brinth LS, Pors K, Hoppe AG, Badreldin I, Mehlsen J (2015) Is Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis a Relevant Diagnosis in Patients with Suspected Side Effects to Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine? International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination 1(1):1-5.

 

[48] Moos WH, Faller DV, Harpp DN, Kanara I, Pernokas J, et al. (2016) Microbiota and Neurological Disorders: A Gut Feeling. Biores Open Access 5(1): 137-145.

 

[49] Sekirov I, Russell SL, Caetano L, Antunes M, Brett (2010) Gut Microbiota in Health and Disease. Physiological Rev 90(3): 859-904.

 

[50] Umbrello G, Esposito S (2016) Microbiota and neurologic diseases: potential effects of probiotics. J Transl Med 14(1): 298.

 

[51] Kinoshita T, Abe RT, Hineno A, Tsunekawa K, Nakane S, et al. (2014) Peripheral sympathetic nerve dysfunction in adolescent Japanese girls following immunization with the human papillomavirus vaccine. Intern Med 53(19): 2185-2200.

 

[53] Zhang L, Richards A, Khalil A, Wogram E, Ma H, Young RA, Jaenisch R. SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2020 Dec 13:2020.12.12.422516. doi: 10.1101/2020.12.12.422516. PMID: 33330870; PMCID: PMC7743078.

 

[53] Young, RO, “Forget Everything Else! Look at THE VAER’s NUMBERS on Injuries and Deaths!.” https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/forget-everything-else-you-ve-heard-just-look-at-the-numbers5

 

[54] Citation: Young RO (2016) Who Had Their Finger on the Magic of Life – Antoine Bechamp or Louis Pasteur?. Int J Vaccines Vaccin 2(5): 00047. DOI: 10.15406/ijvv.2016.02.00047

 

Original​ Content Link

News PDF Archives – Jellyfish.NEWS

Breaking News: