pjmedia.com
Anyone who has watched a losing team late in the game recognizes the move: The players start talking louder, swearing that the other side looks rattled, and noise fills the space where leverage once lived.
Democrats responded to President Donald Trump’s year-end address by insisting he sounded panicky, defensive, and even scared. That claim spread quickly across the left, only to collapse under basic listening. President Trump spoke like a president reviewing progress, not a man searching for cover.
Trump’s address carried a tone of control; he moved methodically through accomplishments from the first 11 months of his presidency. Border enforcement tightened, inflation cooled, and domestic energy production rebounded. Foreign adversaries recalculated. Trump spoke without rush, grievance, or apology.
Critics heard something else because they needed to hear it. Panic serves a purpose; a frightened Trump fits the story they want voters to believe. Confidence backed by results wrecks that storyline.
President Trump contrasted his record with the prior four years, where energy prices surged under earlier leadership, where border control eroded, and global instability grew. Despite a great deal of effort, President Joe Biden wasn’t able to make the pudding stick to the myriad of fantastical whimsies he used to rule the world. Well, along with his wife and Nancy Pelosi.
Trump framed those years as problems already being reversed rather than excuses still being debated, a posture belonging to someone holding ground, not losing it.
Some on the left labeled the speech desperate; others, fearful. Those descriptions revealed more about wishful thinking than reality. Leaders under stress tend to overtalk. Trump summarized, closed decisively, and moved on.
Projection fills gaps when momentum fades. Calm leadership unsettles opponents who rely on chaos narratives. When Trump avoids drama, critics need to invent it…
Home | Caravan to Midnight (zutalk.com)
Be First to Comment