WaPo Media Critic Notices That MSNBC Is a Cesspool of Bias, Sort Of

By Stephen Kruiser 

 

Into every life, a little sunshine must fall, or something. (I hadn’t done a good “or something” in a week or two and one was just busting to get out.) Moments of clarity and honesty aren’t regular fare in mainstream media news organizations like The Washington Post or The New York Times, so they really stick out when they do happen.

The article we’re looking at here was written by The Washington Post’s media critic Erik Wemple. While the temptation is to respond, “Well, duh,” to some of his conclusions, I have to give credit where credit is due. Rarely do any of the Democrats’ water-carriers at WaPo or the Times wander away from the hive mind. Remember, lefties love to eat their own, and there is always a risk of one of them being canceled from within.

The headline for Wemple’s article reads, “MSNBC in five words: ‘I could not agree more’.” The subheading says he’s “Searching for dissent and debate on the cable news home for America.”

Yes, any of us could have saved Wemple some time and told him what he was going to find, but it’s best to let him work through it on his own.

Wemple’s curiosity was piqued by an exchange between MSNBC host Stephanie Ruhle and Michael Steele, one of the network’s favorite fake Republican lapdogs. Ruhle was, predictably, tearing into President Trump and insulting his supporters — boilerplate stuff for the broadcast home of Trump Derangement Syndrome. The subject doesn’t matter; the chihuahua bark commentary at MSNBC all sounds the same. Ever the dutiful, low-T pet, Steele responded to Ruhle’s diatribe by saying, “I could not agree more.” Wemple does not report whether Steele was then given a treat for being obedient…

READ FULL ARTICLE HERE… (pjmedia.com)

 

---

Home | Caravan to Midnight (zutalk.com)

We Need Your Help To Keep Caravan To Midnight Going,

Please Consider Donating To Help Keep Independent Media Independent