100PercentFedUp.com By Jesse Martin
CDC barely checking for reinfections of COVID-19, despite promise to “closely monitor” for them
Back in spring 2020, near the onset of the pandemic, the federal government claimed that it was closely monitoring for reinfections of COVID-19 within the populace. As it turns out, the “closely monitoring” part was a lie. Shocker.
The Informed Consent Action Network–or ICAN–an organization which monitors pharmaceuticals and medical procedures for the sake of providing the public with informed consent, contacted the CDC back in November 2021 with a request for their reinfection data. Four months later the CDC responded with a single page.
The CDC’s Emergency Operations Center responded with less than a single page of results covering the period up to February 10, 2022.
What the CDC provided showed data for only four jurisdictions: New York City, and the states of Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Utah. If that were not bad enough, these jurisdictions were not even consistent among themselves in their methods of identifying and validating reinfections. Worse yet, the CDC did not even examine the data it collected, let alone check it or analyze it. Furthermore, it told our attorneys, “Counts are provisional and subject to change.”
The four jurisdictions put together resulted in only 252, 620 reinfections. However, if these reinfections really were such a concern, then why were only four jurisdictions accounted for in their data?
