LewRockwell By Bill Sardi | June 19, 2020
Well, the online censors already buried this report with a headline like that.
The illogic of COVID-19 coronavirus
The headline of a Huffington Post article of June 15, 2020 reads: “Trump Suggests Stopping COVID-19 Tests Would Result In Fewer Cases.” To which a critic responded President Trump’s logic: “If you stopped charging people with murder, you’d have no murder convictions.”
What President Trump said: ““If we stop testing right now, we’d have very few cases, if any.” A Twit by President Trump has also been a subject of public ridicule: “Without testing…we would be showing almost no cases.”
The President’s statement brought more critical tweets: “If I close my eyes right now, it won’t be sunny anymore!” And another: “If we got rid of x-rays, we’d have very few cavities, if any.”
In a thread of emails I’m privy to, a physician wrote:
“It is interesting that this disconnect in logical thinking may be a result of microvascular disease of the brain, a slow growing brain tumor, or metastatic brain disease. He (Trump) needs a 3T MRI and MRA with gadolinium in order to help the Republicans avoid a catastrophic surprise in November.”
So, the President needs a brain scan, while his opponent can’t mumble a coherent answer to any question posed to him.
Another comment:
“I doubt few people in the entire country are goofy enough to think stopping testing will stop the disease. If he didn’t demonstrate such incompetence every day, people would think that was ridiculous. We’re just numb at this point.”
Mind you, these are learned people posting these critiques.
These quips may play well in REDS vs BLUES political combat, but they do little to help understand the manipulation by the Centers for Disease Control or State governments conduct to frighten the public into prolonged lockdown.
I explained to the email list:
Testing is only being used to keep people in lockdown; as soon as the masses are released from lockdown, more testing is done to make it appear like there are more cases.
By now everyone should have realized the manipulation going on by the CDC. Testing, which is unreliable (false positives and negatives), means very little unless a total population study is being done of sick and non-sick individuals, such as done in Santa Clara County and L.A. county by Stanford and USC, and found 2.0%-7.0% exhibited antibodies, meaning they were exposed and have immunity. Then incidence of infection can be determined. What public health agencies are reporting is intensity of testing, not incidence of infection.
Investigators believe more than 2.0% to 7.0% actually got COVID-19, meaning something other than antibodies were in play, which appears to be zinc-dependent T-cells themselves, which are precursors to antibodies.
This is a revelation because vaccine effectiveness is solely measured by antibody production. If we follow along in this line of thinking, we realize any COVID-19 vaccine can only prevent disease among those who were not infected and developed their own natural immunity, which is the remaining 93-98% w/o proven antibodies. But if a vaccine is designed to produce antibodies and that is the sole narrow measure of vaccine effectiveness, then the vaccine is on the wrong street. It (the vaccine) presumably has to produce T-cells, this is a thymus gland/ zinc dependent process. To produce T-cells, zinc lozenges would be in order during infection, daily zinc pills for daily prevention. (Currently the zinc section of most retail store shelves are empty.)
Skullduggery in progress
One thing for sure, the federal government is operating right out in the open with its unlawful plannedemic. There are a lot of suspicious activities surrounding the arrival of the COVID-19 coronavirus in the U.S.
It is just that there is no one to interpret the COVID-19 crimes of the day. The news press, the so-called 4th estate, is part of the problem rather than the solution. News agencies parrot press releases from the Centers for Disease Control without question. They are distributors of propaganda and fear.
Whatever anti-viral technologies do gain FDA approval and come into common practice, the bet is they will be expensive and American-based. Just look at the scientific pillorying hydroxychloroquine has undergone, a 37-cent medicine.
While the vast majority of Americans are overcoming COVID-19 infections, they aren’t doing it via antibodies. Former FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb has said “America needs to win the coronavirus vaccine race” and said “The United States will have a ‘better’ vaccine than China.”
In a Fox News report dated April 5, 2020, reporter Maria Bartiromo asked current FDA Commissioner Dr. Stephen Hahn: “If the Chinese were to create a vaccine in six months or less and they release it at scale to the U.S., is the FDA ready to quickly review that data to make this vaccine available to the United States?”
Commissioner Hahn replied: ““We are prepared to look at any data around any medical product and in particular vaccines…”
FYI: China’s Sinopharm just announced it is already delivering a COVID-19 vaccine to workers that has a 100% antibody response, if we can take China’s word on this.
CDC unprepared
For one, the Centers for Disease Control was unprepared for this epidemic even though over two years earlier the direct of the National Institute of Infectious Diseases Anthony Fauci predicted (threatened) there would be such an infectious disease outbreak in the U.S. that happened to occur at a politically-sensitive pre-election time.
The shortage of face masks and ventilators was blamed on the Executive Branch of government, not the CDC that has continued responsibility for such outbreaks regardless of who occupies the White House. The CDC director should have resigned over this oversight.
