By Pamela Geller
Nothing outrages the Democrats more than truth and accuracy. Hellzapoppin.
Left Upset as Respected Historian Blisters 1619 Project
Daybreak Insider, September 21, 2021:
Princeton historian Sean Wilentz wrote in his lengthy piece regarding the take on the American Revolution âIf it were a high school history paper, that discussion alone would have been grounds for failure. Itâs rare, after all, to read a student get every single stated fact perfectly wrong, in support of a proposition for which there is no other evidence cited, on two of the most important topics in all of U.S. history, indeed, all of modern history, the causes of the American Revolution and the origins of antislavery. But this wasnât a high school paper, it was the New York Times Magazine, and the author was, according to her contributorâs biography, a highly acclaimed journalist. The essay may have been historically fallacious, but it was also inflammatory and attention-getting (Historica). From Dan McLaughlin:  Wilentz has fired another salvo against the 1619 Project, its editor and lead essayist Nikole Hannah-Jones, Times MagazineÂ
