
By
BUILDING VITALITY: IT STARTS WITH THE SOIL
In the twenty-first-century news feed, toxic chemicals apparently make for “sexy” headlines. These days, one sees countless stories about so-called “forever chemicals,” food dyes and other chemical industry handiwork, not to mention the spate of human-interest stories that surface whenever there is a toxic disaster. The train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio that prompted officials to intentionally set vinyl chloride on fire,1 the Lahaina fires that left Maui with “5 football fields 5 stories deep” of toxic debris2 and the anomalous flooding that sent toxic mud oozing all over Western North Carolina and East Tennessee3 are but three recent examples.
There is certainly cause for concern, especially given that the vast majority of the eighty-six thousand chemicals listed on the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Inventory4—at least 47 percent of which are actively in commerce5—have never been tested for safety or toxicity.6,7 (Under the circumstances, and considering EPA’s well-documented capture by industry,8 the agency’s name should probably be read as somewhat ironic.) This situation will not change any time soon; current approaches for characterizing a chemical’s toxicity cost millions, involve extensive testing on animals and take two to three years per chemical.9
How did we get here? In an interesting 2018 article, a medical historian posits that since the early nineteenth century, the Western world has gone through four phases of “human-toxic interactions”—whether in the industrial, agricultural or medical arenas—characterized by “complex trade-offs between public anxieties, economic interests, and scientific knowledge.”10 First came a period (“normalization”) in which “planners, industrialists, and experts” normalized toxic exposure to polluting industries and compounds containing arsenic, lead and mercury. During the second phase (“fixing toxicity”) that started around the late nineteenth century, constituencies that included “politicians, consumers, unionists, and progressive industrialists” as well as the omnipresent “experts” began differentiating between “acceptable” and “unacceptable” exposure levels, claiming it was possible to establish “safe boundaries” for toxic practices. This was the period in which the top causes of mortality began shifting to cancer and chronic illness…
READ FULL ARTICLE HERE… (westonaprice.org)
Home | Caravan to Midnight (zutalk.com)
Be First to Comment