Apartheid: The Weaponization of a Word to Justify Globalist Control

By: Brendi Wells

The mainstream narrative about apartheid is riddled with propaganda, historical distortions, and outright fabrications. The word “apartheid” itself has been weaponized to equate South Africa’s governance system with racial oppression, when in reality, it was a structure designed to create independent nations for African tribes, allowing them to govern themselves, preserve their languages, and develop their own legacies free from external domination.

However, one of the biggest deliberate lies about apartheid is the false equivalence between segregation laws and apartheid itself.

Segregation vs. Apartheid: Understanding the Difference

Segregation laws and apartheid were mutually exclusive systems, yet media and activists have deliberately blurred the lines to create a false narrative.

• Segregation laws are territorial demarcations that limit access to specific facilities, services, or areas based on racial groups. Examples include:
  • “Whites-only” beaches
  • “Blacks-only” bathrooms
  • Separate public transportation seating
  • Restricted residential areas based on race

This system was not unique to South Africa. It existed all over the world, including the United States under Jim Crow, British-controlled India, and colonial territories in Africa and Asia.

• Apartheid, however, was NOT segregation. It was a territorial governance system, designed to create independent homelands (Bantustans) for African tribes within South Africa—similar to how the United States is made up of independent states under a federal government.

Under apartheid:
✔ Each African tribe was given its own homeland to govern itself.
✔ Each homeland had its own administration, economy, and educational system.
✔ Tribal leadership was preserved, ensuring cultural independence.
✔ The white-led South African government acted as a federal system, funding and supporting these independent territories.

This was not racial segregation—it was tribal self-rule. The logic was that, instead of forcing multiple competing tribes to exist under a single central authority, they would govern themselves independently, with white South Africa acting as the economic and administrative backbone, similar to how Washington, D.C., operates in the U.S. federal system.

Who Was Being “Separated” Under Apartheid?

The anti-apartheid movement falsely claimed that whites “segregated” blacks. But who exactly was being separated?

The real answer: It was not whites separating blacks—it was the tribes being given their own independent states to prevent war and bloodshed.

South Africa is home to over nine major African tribes, including:

• Zulu
• Xhosa
• Venda
• Tswana
• Sotho
• Pedi
• Ndebele
• Swazi
• Others

These groups were not unified. They had long histories of bloodshed, massacres, and violent territorial conflicts.

For example:

• The Xhosa and Zulu despised each other.
• The Venda and Ndebele had a history of war.
• These conflicts were not minor skirmishes—they were brutal tribal wars that resulted in thousands of deaths.

The white-led government stepped in and created a system that granted each tribe its own independent homeland—just as the United States grants each state control over its own affairs. This system put an end to tribal wars, saved lives, and helped build South Africa into the most developed nation on the continent.

Thus, apartheid was not about racial separation—it was about tribal independence.

The Role of White South Africa: Stability, Education, and Economic Growth

The white-led government functioned as a federal government, providing:
✔ Education – Built schools and universities for black South Africans.
✔ Healthcare – Created the world’s largest hospital for black citizens.
✔ Infrastructure – Developed roads, electricity, and public services.
✔ Economic Growth – Funded black homelands with white tax money.

If apartheid was truly a system of racial extermination, then:

• How did the black population grow from 5 million to 40 million under apartheid?
• How did black literacy rates reach 71%, higher than most African nations?
• Why did the government build 15 new classrooms for black students every working day?
• Why did 56% of the national budget go toward black communities?

These are indisputable facts, yet they are never mentioned because they contradict the carefully crafted narrative that apartheid was purely oppressive.

Under apartheid:

• Soweto had more schools, churches, cars, and infrastructure than most independent African nations.
• Baragwanath Hospital, the largest hospital in the world, was built for black South Africans, staffed with 456 full-time doctors, performing over 900 heart surgeries per year—94% of its blood donors were white.
• Black living standards rose by 5.4% per year.

Yet, in 1994, this entire system was handed over to black-majority rule, and in just 31 years, South Africa went from a thriving first-world nation to a country on the brink of collapse.

---

The Real Reason Apartheid Was Dismantled

The destruction of apartheid was never about liberation—it was about ensuring South Africa could never be an independent republic outside of British globalist control.

This is why Britain and the West waged an economic war against South Africa, using sanctions, media manipulation, and internal sabotage to bring about the downfall of the system.

And who was installed to oversee this transformation?

Mandela: A Globalist Puppet in Blackface

Nelson Mandela is celebrated as a liberator, yet his first act as president was to rejoin the British Commonwealth—undoing South Africa’s independence.

• Mandela was a 33rd-degree Knight of Malta, meaning he was deeply embedded in globalist secret societies.
• Instead of continuing the independent tribal homelands, he dismantled them, creating a failed, chaotic state under corrupt ANC rule.
• He was not a hero—he was a carefully placed puppet to transfer power from South African sovereignty back to globalist control.

---

The Aftermath of Apartheid: A Nation Betrayed

Post-1994, South Africa’s once-thriving infrastructure collapsed:
✔ Crime skyrocketed – South Africa now has some of the highest murder and rape rates in the world.
✔ Corruption spread – Billions in taxpayer funds are stolen annually.
✔ Electricity grid failing – Rolling blackouts are now the norm.
✔ Tribal tensions resurfaced – The same conflicts apartheid had prevented are now returning.

Yet, even after 31 years of black-majority rule, apartheid is still blamed for every failure.

When will the real culprits—those in power today—be held accountable?

---

The Final Truth: Apartheid Was Not the Enemy—Globalism Was

South Africa’s apartheid system was not perfect, but it was not the genocidal, oppressive regime the world has been led to believe.

✔ It prevented tribal warfare.
✔ It built infrastructure, schools, and hospitals.
✔ It provided economic stability.

The truth is: Apartheid was destroyed not because it was “inhumane,” but because it made South Africa independent and ungovernable by Western globalists.

Mandela did not free South Africa—he handed it over to the very forces that sought to destroy it.

Educate yourself. The truth is never what the media tells you.