Press "Enter" to skip to content

‘People need to be arrested’: FBI got OK for ‘deadly force’ at Mar-a-Lago!

By Bob Unruh

 

Agents ‘risked’ the lives of President Trump and his family and guests

The FBI’s shocking armed raid on President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in Florida after he finished his first term in the White House remains one of the stunners of the Joe Biden era at the federal agency.

Officers marched onto the property, demanded compliance with their orders for privacy and a video security system, scattered government documents on the floor and photographed them, and then took boxes and boxes – apparently snatching some of Trump’s private belongings.

This all happened because the leftists at the National Archives apparently colluded with the Biden White House to assemble a criminal case against Trump – at a time when his representatives apparently were trying to work out all of the disputes that were involved in ownership of documents from his presidency.

Now it’s gone further.

A lot.

Investigative journalist Julie Kelly, who has pursued the misbehaviors of the Biden administration diligently, has discovered from government documents that the FBI agents in the raid were authorized to use “deadly force when necessary.”

That would have been one way, although extreme, to assure the Democrats victory in their lawfare campaign to try to prevent Trump from challenging the “diminished” Joe Biden for the White House this year.

Actually, that could have made the subsequent “lawfare” cases unnecessary.

Twitchy explained, “It sounds like the FBI and other government officials went into Mar-a-Lago like they were going on the Bin Laden raid. But wait, it gets even worse.”

She continued, “Oh my God. Armed FBI agents were preparing to confront Trump and even engage Secret Service if necessary. They were going to go door to door to terrorize MAL guests and even pick the locks. Gestapo…

READ FULL ARTICLE HERE… (wnd.com)Live Stream + Chat (zutalk.com)

 


Home | Caravan to Midnight (zutalk.com)

We Need Your Help To Keep Caravan To Midnight Going,

Please Consider Donating To Help Keep Independent Media Independent

One Comment

  1. Swordslinger Swordslinger May 22, 2024

    Doesn’t matter if this is standard for such warrants. Anyone with a lick of sense would remove that clause if serving it on a former President.
    I’m sure somebody was hoping something would happen so they would “have to” shoot and kill President Trump.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Breaking News: